Difference between revisions of "Logical fallacy"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Reference: yes, creationWiki has an article on logical fallacy)
(SMW, navbox)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]A [[logical fallacy]] is a seemingly logical or [[rational]] argument which violates the rules of [[logic]]. Logical fallacy is a technique often used (perhaps unwittingly) in [[rhetoric]]al discourse to persuade others without sound reasoning, i.e. [[rhetorical deception]].
+
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::mistake]]
 +
[[thing type::phenomenon]]
 +
[[thing type::tool]]
 +
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]]
 +
</hide>
 +
{{nav/dark-arts}}
 +
==About==
 +
A [[logical fallacy]] is a seemingly logical or [[rational]] argument which violates the rules of [[logic]]. Logical fallacy is a technique often used (perhaps unwittingly) in [[rhetoric]]al discourse to persuade others without sound reasoning, i.e. [[rhetorical deception]].
 
==Related Articles==
 
==Related Articles==
 
* The [[:Category:logical fallacies|logical fallacies]] category has a list of logical fallacies
 
* The [[:Category:logical fallacies|logical fallacies]] category has a list of logical fallacies

Revision as of 01:28, 27 October 2012

Dark Arts portal

About

A logical fallacy is a seemingly logical or rational argument which violates the rules of logic. Logical fallacy is a technique often used (perhaps unwittingly) in rhetorical discourse to persuade others without sound reasoning, i.e. rhetorical deception.

Related Articles

Links

Reference

standard references

specialized references

Articles

  • 2007-08-15 One Argument Against An Army: this may illustrate a form of logical fallacy
  • 2007-04-27 The Fallacy Fallacy warns against the idea that an argument is invalid just because it follows the form of a logical fallacy. The article does not, however, give any examples of valid arguments presented in a fallacious form. That said, it would seem true that most logical fallacies have valid arguments at their core, but that they have been somehow misapplied to a new context; it is worth cataloging these errors, as they are both frequent and hard to spot (possibly because they play on flaws in our lower-level reasoning systems).