Difference between revisions of "Moralism"

From Issuepedia
(Created page with '==Overview== category:terms of conveniencecategory:conceptscategory:ismsMoralitarianism, a.k.a. morality-based thinking, is the belief that a community must a...')
 
(Overview: rationalization)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
'''In other words''': Moralitarianism holds that, regardless of what the evidence may show, people whose morals we agree with must never be held accountable for their bad actions because that is damaging to our credibility, while assigning blame to someone whose morals we disagree with is always acceptable.
 
'''In other words''': Moralitarianism holds that, regardless of what the evidence may show, people whose morals we agree with must never be held accountable for their bad actions because that is damaging to our credibility, while assigning blame to someone whose morals we disagree with is always acceptable.
  
This belief seems to form the core of contemporary [[American conservatism]] and explains the seemingly shameless tendency among its adherents to [[cherry-pick]] whatever arguments seem to support their case at the moment, disregarding consistency between one argument and the next and dismissing the need for factual accuracy.
+
This belief seems to form the core of contemporary [[American conservatism]] and explains the seemingly shameless tendency among its adherents to [[rationalize]] their position using whatever arguments seem to support their case at the moment ([[cherry-picking]]), disregarding consistency between one argument and the next and ignoring or dismissing the need for factual accuracy.
 
===Examples===
 
===Examples===
 
* the conservative insistence on [[Bill Clinton helped cause the 2008 mortgage crisis|blaming Clinton for the 2008 mortgage crisis]] when in fact there is no real reason to do so and there are many much stronger reasons to blame George W. Bush for causing it, if any one person is to be held responsible
 
* the conservative insistence on [[Bill Clinton helped cause the 2008 mortgage crisis|blaming Clinton for the 2008 mortgage crisis]] when in fact there is no real reason to do so and there are many much stronger reasons to blame George W. Bush for causing it, if any one person is to be held responsible

Revision as of 12:25, 8 October 2009

Overview

Moralitarianism, a.k.a. morality-based thinking, is the belief that a community must assign blame or innocence in ways which reinforce the community's existing morals, rather than based on objective evidence. It is firmly in opposition to the central premise of science, which is that truth can only be determined by the careful study of impartial observations (sometimes referred to disparagingly as "reality-based thinking" by moralitarians).

In other words: Moralitarianism holds that, regardless of what the evidence may show, people whose morals we agree with must never be held accountable for their bad actions because that is damaging to our credibility, while assigning blame to someone whose morals we disagree with is always acceptable.

This belief seems to form the core of contemporary American conservatism and explains the seemingly shameless tendency among its adherents to rationalize their position using whatever arguments seem to support their case at the moment (cherry-picking), disregarding consistency between one argument and the next and ignoring or dismissing the need for factual accuracy.

Examples

  • the conservative insistence on blaming Clinton for the 2008 mortgage crisis when in fact there is no real reason to do so and there are many much stronger reasons to blame George W. Bush for causing it, if any one person is to be held responsible

Related