Difference between revisions of "Nuclear power"
(→News: notes: transparent nuke idea) |
m (→Notes: removed redundant "it") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-59/iss-2/p19.html Stronger Future for Nuclear Power] ([http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/23/0011252 slashdot]) | * '''2006-02-23''' [http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-59/iss-2/p19.html Stronger Future for Nuclear Power] ([http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/23/0011252 slashdot]) | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| − | Personally, I'd be very interested in seeing a new approach to nuclear power plant management using information-age tools, and the "[[many eyes make all bugs shallow]]" approach: webcams on every console, doorway, and access point; publicly-accessible telemetry data; a wiki and blogs maintained by plant workers; chat rooms for workers to let off steam (or mention their worries) during lunch breaks (with convenient computer terminals in the snack rooms); cooperative ownership of the plant, with residents within "fallout" range automatically given priority in voting; and so on. Only in this way can we be sure that safety issues will not be shoved under the carpet, as is apparently being done at Shearon-Harris, our friendly neighborhood nuclear plant here in North Carolina. More nuclear plants without these tools | + | Personally, I'd be very interested in seeing a new approach to nuclear power plant management using information-age tools, and the "[[many eyes make all bugs shallow]]" approach: webcams on every console, doorway, and access point; publicly-accessible telemetry data; a wiki and blogs maintained by plant workers; chat rooms for workers to let off steam (or mention their worries) during lunch breaks (with convenient computer terminals in the snack rooms); cooperative ownership of the plant, with residents within "fallout" range automatically given priority in voting; and so on. Only in this way can we be sure that safety issues will not be shoved under the carpet, as is apparently being done at Shearon-Harris, our friendly neighborhood nuclear plant here in North Carolina. More nuclear plants without these tools will be business as usual; a nuclear plant with these tools might have a chance to actually be a positive thing. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:24, 5 October 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:40, 5 October 2006
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Links
- Ignorance about Nuclear Power is Killing Us
- Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger by Alex Gabbard, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
News
- 2006-04-16 Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case (slashdot) by Patrick Moore, a founder of Greenpeace
- 2006-02-23 Stronger Future for Nuclear Power (slashdot)
Notes
Personally, I'd be very interested in seeing a new approach to nuclear power plant management using information-age tools, and the "many eyes make all bugs shallow" approach: webcams on every console, doorway, and access point; publicly-accessible telemetry data; a wiki and blogs maintained by plant workers; chat rooms for workers to let off steam (or mention their worries) during lunch breaks (with convenient computer terminals in the snack rooms); cooperative ownership of the plant, with residents within "fallout" range automatically given priority in voting; and so on. Only in this way can we be sure that safety issues will not be shoved under the carpet, as is apparently being done at Shearon-Harris, our friendly neighborhood nuclear plant here in North Carolina. More nuclear plants without these tools will be business as usual; a nuclear plant with these tools might have a chance to actually be a positive thing. --Woozle 19:24, 5 October 2006 (EDT)