Difference between revisions of "Pearl Harbor attack"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Overview: updated self-link)
(notes -- possible leads; smw)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
[[category:1941-12-07]][[category:US]][[category:cover-ups]]The [[Pearl Harbor attack|attack on Pearl Harbor]] on December 7, 1941, was the incident which brought the {{USA}} into [[World War II]].{{seed}}
+
[[page type::article]]
 
+
[[thing type::attack]]
 +
[[thing type::event]]
 +
[[thing type::tragedy]]
 +
{{datecat|1941-12-07}}
 +
[[category:US]]
 +
[[category:cover-ups]]
 +
[[category:events]]
 +
[[category:tragedies]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
The [[Pearl Harbor attack|attack on Pearl Harbor]] on {{date|1941-12-07|December 7, 1941}}, was the incident which brought the {{USA}} into [[World War II]].{{seed}}
 +
===Theory===
 
Despite the official story that the attack came as a complete surprise, there appears to be a strong historical case that top US officials:
 
Despite the official story that the attack came as a complete surprise, there appears to be a strong historical case that top US officials:
 
* knew of the impending attack
 
* knew of the impending attack
Line 8: Line 19:
 
* kept officers at Pearl Harbor in the dark about the latest intelligence, and generally out of the loop
 
* kept officers at Pearl Harbor in the dark about the latest intelligence, and generally out of the loop
  
 +
If true, the attack was an [[engineered provocation]] sought deliberately by the highest levels of the US government in order to inflame public sentiment and gain the necessary political support for entering the war.
 +
===Counter===
 +
Cujo359 said, on [http://entequilaesverdad.blogspot.com/2009/12/pearl-harbor-day.html?showComment=1260304444354#c5156588221075435746 2009-12-08], that this is:<blockquote><p>...a whacky conspiracy theory. Pearl Harbor was one of the most well-defended bases we had. If the base had been as alert as it should have been, the Japanese attack would have been blunted, if not repelled.</p>
 +
 +
<p>The people who ran the base, and some of the people who supervised them, screwed up.</p>
 +
 +
<p>Sorry to give such a short answer, but I get impatient with nonsense like this. The dictum that you should never ascribe to conspiracy what can be explained by incompetence applies here in spades.</p>
 +
</blockquote>
 
==Related==
 
==Related==
 
* The [[2001-09-11 attacks]] have been compared to the Pearl Harbor attack.
 
* The [[2001-09-11 attacks]] have been compared to the Pearl Harbor attack.
Line 17: Line 36:
 
* <s>{{sourcewatch}}</s>: no article as of 2007-12-25
 
* <s>{{sourcewatch}}</s>: no article as of 2007-12-25
 
===Filed Links===
 
===Filed Links===
{{links.tagged}}
+
{{links/news}}
 +
==Notes==
 +
[https://plus.google.com/u/0/102759937261946657521/posts/3tDNTpLxfU4 This post] has some links which may have more information.

Latest revision as of 23:41, 15 December 2014

About

The attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, was the incident which brought the United States into World War II.

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Theory

Despite the official story that the attack came as a complete surprise, there appears to be a strong historical case that top US officials:

  • knew of the impending attack
  • had antagonized the Japanese with the idea of encouraging them to attack
  • ordered the fleet at Pearl Harbor into a configuration which would be the most heavily damaged by an air attack
  • kept officers at Pearl Harbor in the dark about the latest intelligence, and generally out of the loop

If true, the attack was an engineered provocation sought deliberately by the highest levels of the US government in order to inflame public sentiment and gain the necessary political support for entering the war.

Counter

Cujo359 said, on 2009-12-08, that this is:

...a whacky conspiracy theory. Pearl Harbor was one of the most well-defended bases we had. If the base had been as alert as it should have been, the Japanese attack would have been blunted, if not repelled.

The people who ran the base, and some of the people who supervised them, screwed up.

Sorry to give such a short answer, but I get impatient with nonsense like this. The dictum that you should never ascribe to conspiracy what can be explained by incompetence applies here in spades.

Related

Links

Filed Links

Related


Notes

This post has some links which may have more information.