Difference between revisions of "Political ideologies"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Brainstorming: some revisions; underlines)
m (→‎Brainstorming: doctrinaire)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[[Category:Brainstorming]]What other dimensions might be significant in measuring political ideology?
 
[[Category:Brainstorming]]What other dimensions might be significant in measuring political ideology?
 
* <u>willingness to reopen discussion of ''existing'' solutions</u> (as opposed to just solving ''new'' problems), in different arenas (e.g. social, as in marriage laws; infrastructure, as in power generation - liberals don't want to reconsider nuclear as an option, for example)
 
* <u>willingness to reopen discussion of ''existing'' solutions</u> (as opposed to just solving ''new'' problems), in different arenas (e.g. social, as in marriage laws; infrastructure, as in power generation - liberals don't want to reconsider nuclear as an option, for example)
* importance of <u>studying doctrine</u> ("doctrinality"?) vs. use of <u>reasoning</u> (Pournelle box only charts reason vs. irrationality - is "belief in an incorruptible doctrine" a form of irrationality? If so, is it the ''only'' form?)
+
* importance of <u>studying doctrine</u> ("doctrinality" or "doctrinaire") vs. use of <u>reasoning</u> (Pournelle box only charts reason vs. irrationality - is "belief in an incorruptible doctrine" a form of irrationality? If so, is it the ''only'' form?)
 
* preference for <u>superior-inferior (usually hierarchical)</u> power relationships, as opposed to <u>peer-peer</u>
 
* preference for <u>superior-inferior (usually hierarchical)</u> power relationships, as opposed to <u>peer-peer</u>
 
* belief that the human condition <u>can be improved</u> (however slowly) vs. the idea of a <u>golden past</u> to which we can only aspire to one day return (usually by following the rules laid out in some ancient doctrine; this tends to go together with doctrinality)
 
* belief that the human condition <u>can be improved</u> (however slowly) vs. the idea of a <u>golden past</u> to which we can only aspire to one day return (usually by following the rules laid out in some ancient doctrine; this tends to go together with doctrinality)

Revision as of 22:24, 4 March 2006

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

The quantifying of all political ideologies as falling somewhere in a "left-right" spectrum is generally misleading and appears to arise largely from a short-lived circumstance of seating in the French National Assembly in the 18th century[1]. Other systems have been proposed, generally using two or more dimensions.

Political Spectra

References

  1. The Pournelle Political Axes (1986)

Brainstorming

What other dimensions might be significant in measuring political ideology?

  • willingness to reopen discussion of existing solutions (as opposed to just solving new problems), in different arenas (e.g. social, as in marriage laws; infrastructure, as in power generation - liberals don't want to reconsider nuclear as an option, for example)
  • importance of studying doctrine ("doctrinality" or "doctrinaire") vs. use of reasoning (Pournelle box only charts reason vs. irrationality - is "belief in an incorruptible doctrine" a form of irrationality? If so, is it the only form?)
  • preference for superior-inferior (usually hierarchical) power relationships, as opposed to peer-peer
  • belief that the human condition can be improved (however slowly) vs. the idea of a golden past to which we can only aspire to one day return (usually by following the rules laid out in some ancient doctrine; this tends to go together with doctrinality)