Difference between revisions of "Rhetoric"
(some refinements and updates) |
(→Related: catg link) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
While rhetoric can be used positively, as a tool to convey difficult new ideas and get past existing [[cognitive bias]] in situations where a [[rational]] argument may be ineffective, but unfortunately it is more commonly used [[antiepistemic]]ally – i.e. to induce erroneous [[belief]]s in others. When amplified by the memetic power of the [[mainstream media]] (either explicitly – paid advertising – or complicity, in support of the [[plutonomy|plutocratic agenda]] of the mainstream media's [[media consolidation|consolidated ownership]]) this often leads to popular support for extremely harmful actions. | While rhetoric can be used positively, as a tool to convey difficult new ideas and get past existing [[cognitive bias]] in situations where a [[rational]] argument may be ineffective, but unfortunately it is more commonly used [[antiepistemic]]ally – i.e. to induce erroneous [[belief]]s in others. When amplified by the memetic power of the [[mainstream media]] (either explicitly – paid advertising – or complicity, in support of the [[plutonomy|plutocratic agenda]] of the mainstream media's [[media consolidation|consolidated ownership]]) this often leads to popular support for extremely harmful actions. | ||
===Related=== | ===Related=== | ||
| + | * '''Category page''': {{lc}} | ||
* [[Rhetorical manipulation]] is the negative use of [[rhetoric]], i.e. to promote false [[belief]]s | * [[Rhetorical manipulation]] is the negative use of [[rhetoric]], i.e. to promote false [[belief]]s | ||
* [[Rhetorical distortion]] is where a [[rhetoric]]al argument is based on distorted truth | * [[Rhetorical distortion]] is where a [[rhetoric]]al argument is based on distorted truth | ||
Latest revision as of 12:44, 3 August 2021
About
Rhetoric, in the modern political sense, is the art of verbal manipulation to convince others of a predetermined conclusion. It typically consists of appeals to emotion packaged in memorable wording, often backed by logically fallacious reasoning.
Uses
While rhetoric can be used positively, as a tool to convey difficult new ideas and get past existing cognitive bias in situations where a rational argument may be ineffective, but unfortunately it is more commonly used antiepistemically – i.e. to induce erroneous beliefs in others. When amplified by the memetic power of the mainstream media (either explicitly – paid advertising – or complicity, in support of the plutocratic agenda of the mainstream media's consolidated ownership) this often leads to popular support for extremely harmful actions.
Related
- Category page: Rhetoric
- Rhetorical manipulation is the negative use of rhetoric, i.e. to promote false beliefs
- Rhetorical distortion is where a rhetorical argument is based on distorted truth
- Rhetorical deceptions are specific techniques used for rhetorical distortion
- rhetorical spin
- interpretive framing
Links
- Wiktionary
- Wikipedia
- Conservapedia
dKosopediano equivalent page as of 2010-07-15; see Religious Political RhetoricSourceWatchno equivalent page as of 2010-07-15; see Empty rhetoric- RationalWiki
- LessWrong Wiki (as of 2010-07-15) redirects to Dark arts, which refers to the negative uses of rhetoric: "...rhetorical techniques crafted to exploit human cognitive biases in order to persuade, deceive, or otherwise manipulate a person into irrationally accepting [predetermined] beliefs"
