Rhetorical deception/valid uses

From Issuepedia
< Rhetorical deception
Revision as of 11:21, 12 December 2016 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==About== Use of a rhetorical tool does not ''automatically'' invalidate the substance of the argument in which it is used. ===Listener=== If you are the argument/listen...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

About

Use of a rhetorical tool does not automatically invalidate the substance of the argument in which it is used.

Listener

If you are the audience for an argument that employs a rhetorical deception, its presence should be taken as a signal that the argument should be examined and handled with extra care.

Once a deception has been identified:

  • It may be called out. (This may or may not be productive, depending on circumstances.)
  • The argument should be evaluated as if the rhetoric were not present.

The presence of a rhetorical deception without an accompanying rational justification is a red flag.

Speaker

If you are making of an argument, rhetorical deceptions should only be used as a supplement to arguments of a more rational nature – persuasive dressing on a rational salad.

This is a growing seedling article. You can help Issuepedia by watering it.