Difference between revisions of "Rhetorical spin"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(crosslinks and explanations)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<hide>
 +
[[thing type::rhetorical deception]]
 +
[[category:rhetorical deception]]
 +
</hide>
 
==About==
 
==About==
[[category:rhetorical deceptions]][[Rhetorical spin]], usually referred to as just "spin", is a [[rhetorical deception]] in which a given set of information is interpreted in such a way as to divert or quell criticism which would normally be applied to that information.
+
[[Rhetorical spin]], usually referred to as just "spin", is a [[rhetorical deception]] in which a given set of information is interpreted in such a way as to divert or quell criticism which would normally be applied to that information.
{{seedling}}
+
 
 
Rhetorical spin is like [[interpretive framing]], but applied to a narrower information set. (If framing is the overall game strategy, "spin" might be analogous to a particular pitch.)
 
Rhetorical spin is like [[interpretive framing]], but applied to a narrower information set. (If framing is the overall game strategy, "spin" might be analogous to a particular pitch.)
 
==Quotes about==
 
==Quotes about==
[[Daniel Dennett]]'s "Canons of good spin", from [[youtube:D_9w8JougLQ|The Evolution of Confusion]] (talk at AAI 2009):
+
[[Daniel Dennett]]'s "Canons of good spin", from [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_9w8JougLQ The Evolution of Confusion] (talk at AAI 2009):
 
<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>
 
# It is not a bare-faced [[lie]].
 
# It is not a bare-faced [[lie]].

Latest revision as of 13:33, 3 August 2021

About

Rhetorical spin, usually referred to as just "spin", is a rhetorical deception in which a given set of information is interpreted in such a way as to divert or quell criticism which would normally be applied to that information.

Rhetorical spin is like interpretive framing, but applied to a narrower information set. (If framing is the overall game strategy, "spin" might be analogous to a particular pitch.)

Quotes about

Daniel Dennett's "Canons of good spin", from The Evolution of Confusion (talk at AAI 2009):

  1. It is not a bare-faced lie.
  2. You have to be able to say it with a straight face.
  3. It has to relieve skepticism without arousing curiosity.
  4. It should seem profound.

Item 3 means that "spin" is a form of curiosity-stopper.