Difference between revisions of "Social Darwinism"
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::ideology form of::anarchism form of::elitism </hide> ==About== Social Darwinism is an elitist ideology which ...") |
(sorcy tumblr; rationalwiki) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[page type::article]] | [[page type::article]] | ||
[[thing type::ideology]] | [[thing type::ideology]] | ||
| − | |||
[[form of::elitism]] | [[form of::elitism]] | ||
| + | [[category:isms]] | ||
| + | [[category:political ideologies]] | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
[[Social Darwinism]] is an [[elitist]] [[ideology]] which asserts that individuals should work only for their own interests, and that [[society]] and [[government]] should reflect this idea by following the dictates of [[natural selection]], thus maximizing the pace of human [[evolution]]. It generally advocates doing as little as possible to aid those who "fail" economically, even to the point of allowing them to die, while helping those who "succeed" by rewarding them still further, thus encouraging the propagation of "successful" genes. | [[Social Darwinism]] is an [[elitist]] [[ideology]] which asserts that individuals should work only for their own interests, and that [[society]] and [[government]] should reflect this idea by following the dictates of [[natural selection]], thus maximizing the pace of human [[evolution]]. It generally advocates doing as little as possible to aid those who "fail" economically, even to the point of allowing them to die, while helping those who "succeed" by rewarding them still further, thus encouraging the propagation of "successful" genes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is consistent in many ways with the goals of [[eugenics]], although eugenics might suggest (for example) offering affordable gene counseling and therapy to poor people, while social Darwinism would hold that natural selection should be allowed to do its work unassisted. | ||
It is antithetical to the idea of [[socialism]], which advocates universal care and remediation of [[economic disparities]]. | It is antithetical to the idea of [[socialism]], which advocates universal care and remediation of [[economic disparities]]. | ||
| + | ==Misuse== | ||
| + | [[Creationist]]s often try to use [[social Darwinism]] as proof of the [[bad]] consequences of [[Darwinism]] (a term they coined for "belief in the theory of [[evolution]]") and thereby as an [[anti-Darwinism|attack on the theory of evolution]], which (they argue) people should therefore choose ''not'' to believe in regardless of the [[evidence]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is, of course, complete nonsense; it is an [[argument by association]] at best. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Darwinism]], by itself, is not an ideology (a position advocating action) but rather a position or [[belief]] about the nature of the universe. As such, it is neither [[good]] nor [[bad]], except in the secondary sense that accurate knowledge about the universe is a good thing to have. Further, changing one's beliefs about the universe does not affect how the universe actually operates; it only affects how well one is able to achieve goals through use of one's knowledge about the universe. Inaccurate beliefs are much more likely than accurate ones to result in ineffective actions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is a prime example of [[religious hypocrisy]] and [[intellectual dishonesty]] that many of the people who use social Darwinism as an attack on the theory of evolution nonetheless advocate social Darwinist policies. | ||
| + | ==Conclusions== | ||
| + | [[Social Darwinism]] essentially denies one of the fundamental tenets of [[civilization]], the idea that people in a [[society]] have some obligation to protect each other from [[harm]], and is therefore destructive of the goals of a civilized society. | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
* {{wikipedia}} | * {{wikipedia}} | ||
* {{conservapedia}} | * {{conservapedia}} | ||
| + | * {{rationalwiki}} | ||
| + | ===to file=== | ||
| + | * '''2018-08-29''' [http://sorcyress.tumblr.com/post/177538708592/philosophy-and-coffee-apparentlyeverything them: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST MEANS HUMANS MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT AND COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT]: a rebuttal | ||
{{links/smw}} | {{links/smw}} | ||
Revision as of 13:44, 30 August 2018
About
Social Darwinism is an elitist ideology which asserts that individuals should work only for their own interests, and that society and government should reflect this idea by following the dictates of natural selection, thus maximizing the pace of human evolution. It generally advocates doing as little as possible to aid those who "fail" economically, even to the point of allowing them to die, while helping those who "succeed" by rewarding them still further, thus encouraging the propagation of "successful" genes.
It is consistent in many ways with the goals of eugenics, although eugenics might suggest (for example) offering affordable gene counseling and therapy to poor people, while social Darwinism would hold that natural selection should be allowed to do its work unassisted.
It is antithetical to the idea of socialism, which advocates universal care and remediation of economic disparities.
Misuse
Creationists often try to use social Darwinism as proof of the bad consequences of Darwinism (a term they coined for "belief in the theory of evolution") and thereby as an attack on the theory of evolution, which (they argue) people should therefore choose not to believe in regardless of the evidence.
This is, of course, complete nonsense; it is an argument by association at best.
Darwinism, by itself, is not an ideology (a position advocating action) but rather a position or belief about the nature of the universe. As such, it is neither good nor bad, except in the secondary sense that accurate knowledge about the universe is a good thing to have. Further, changing one's beliefs about the universe does not affect how the universe actually operates; it only affects how well one is able to achieve goals through use of one's knowledge about the universe. Inaccurate beliefs are much more likely than accurate ones to result in ineffective actions.
It is a prime example of religious hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty that many of the people who use social Darwinism as an attack on the theory of evolution nonetheless advocate social Darwinist policies.
Conclusions
Social Darwinism essentially denies one of the fundamental tenets of civilization, the idea that people in a society have some obligation to protect each other from harm, and is therefore destructive of the goals of a civilized society.
Links
Reference
to file
- 2018-08-29 them: SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST MEANS HUMANS MUST BE INDIVIDUALLY SELF-SUFFICIENT AND COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT: a rebuttal