Talk:2007-04-16 How Could a Loving God
Revision as of 14:52, 26 July 2008 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Talk:2007-04-17 The inevitable attack on science moved to Talk:2007-04-16 How Could a Loving God: really belongs with Ham's original article)
Woozle notes
Ken Ham's interpretation is backwards in at least the following ways:
- The perpetrator apparently had some kind of Jesus fixation (research needed)
- There is significant evidence that legalized abortion reduces crime
- The more life is mass-produced, surely the "cheaper" it is. The "pro-life" position emphasizes exactly what Ham tries to blame science for: quantity over quality.