Difference between revisions of "Talk:2007-12-21 Inhofe recycles unscientific attacks on global warming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→aHRKuQDIx: new section) |
m (Reverted edits by 71.194.59.212 (Talk) to last version by Woozle) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem. | Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 01:18, 9 August 2009
Woozle notes
The attack on Freeman Dyson was a bit ad hominem, as there is nothing inherently nonsensical about the idea of a nuke-powered spacecraft; several different versions have been proposed by different people. Unfortunately, all of the ground-launching ones are now banned by international treaty, as I understand it, despite the fact that it might provide substantially cheaper access to space -- something which is desperately needed for a number of reasons.
Also, Ray Kurzweil may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.