Difference between revisions of "Talk:2007-12-21 Inhofe recycles unscientific attacks on global warming"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 81.164.5.237 (Talk) to last version by Woozle)
(→‎aHRKuQDIx: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.
 
Also, [[Ray Kurzweil]] may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.
 +
 +
== aHRKuQDIx ==
 +
 +
Great work, webmaster, nice design!

Revision as of 18:58, 8 August 2009

Woozle notes

The attack on Freeman Dyson was a bit ad hominem, as there is nothing inherently nonsensical about the idea of a nuke-powered spacecraft; several different versions have been proposed by different people. Unfortunately, all of the ground-launching ones are now banned by international treaty, as I understand it, despite the fact that it might provide substantially cheaper access to space -- something which is desperately needed for a number of reasons.

Also, Ray Kurzweil may well be right about nanotech and energy – there has been quite a lot of progress just recently in the area of energy generation – but the author is still quite correct in saying that we can't wait around for deus ex machinae to solve the problem.

aHRKuQDIx

Great work, webmaster, nice design!