Difference between revisions of "Talk:Global warming/skepticism/arguments"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(an irrefutable argument)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Odd Edits==
 
==Odd Edits==
 
{{anonuser|121.209.240.171}} [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Arguments_against_global_warming&diff=20642&oldid=prev modified] most of the "dissident" scientist positions to favor anthropogenic global warming instead of being against it. I can only think that this person was confused about the meaning of that section.[[category:odd edits]]
 
{{anonuser|121.209.240.171}} [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Arguments_against_global_warming&diff=20642&oldid=prev modified] most of the "dissident" scientist positions to favor anthropogenic global warming instead of being against it. I can only think that this person was confused about the meaning of that section.[[category:odd edits]]
 +
 +
{{anonuser|205.126.74.213}} added "just get it in ur head that global warming is not happening." And changed "The Earth is not warming" to "The Earth is deffinantly not in any way what so ever ur stupid if u belive other wise not warming." Wow, what a devastating argument. I'm speechless. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 20:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:12, 16 February 2011

Odd Edits

anonymous user 121.209.240.171 modified most of the "dissident" scientist positions to favor anthropogenic global warming instead of being against it. I can only think that this person was confused about the meaning of that section.

anonymous user 205.126.74.213 added "just get it in ur head that global warming is not happening." And changed "The Earth is not warming" to "The Earth is deffinantly not in any way what so ever ur stupid if u belive other wise not warming." Wow, what a devastating argument. I'm speechless. --Woozle 20:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)