Difference between revisions of "The Bell Curve"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::book work author::Charles Murray category:books </hide> ==About== ''The Bell Curve'' is a controversial 1994 book by...")
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
==Footnote==
 
==Footnote==
 
<references>
 
<references>
<ref name=klein>'''2018-03-27''' [https://samharris.org/ezra-klein-editor-chief/ Ezra Klein: Editor-in-Chief]</ref>
+
<ref name=klein>'''2018-03-27''' [https://samharris.org/ezra-klein-editor-chief/ Ezra Klein: Editor-in-Chief]
 +
* related: '''2018-03-29''' [https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2018/03/29/for-someone-who-doesnt-like-to-be-called-a-racist-sam-harris-sure-writes-a-lot-of-racist-stuff/ For someone who doesn’t like to be called a racist, Sam Harris sure writes a lot of racist stuff] ([https://octodon.social/@pzmyers/99767365351021580 via])</ref>
 
</references>
 
</references>

Revision as of 15:55, 29 March 2018

About

The Bell Curve is a controversial 1994 book by psychologist Richard Herrnstein and marketist political scientist Charles Murray.

The "most provicative claims in the book" are[1]:

  1. Human “general intelligence” is a scientifically valid concept.
  2. IQ tests do a pretty good job of measuring it.
  3. A person’s IQ is highly predictive of his/her success in life.
  4. Mean IQ differs across populations (blacks < whites < Asians).
  5. It isn’t known to what degree differences in IQ are genetically determined, but it seems safe to say that genes play a role (and also safe to say that environment does too).

Items 1 and 2, at a minimum, have been pretty well refuted; RationalWiki has a pretty thorough analysis.

This is a growing seedling article. You can help Issuepedia by watering it.

Links

Footnote