Difference between revisions of "Thread:Talk:Bill Clinton vs. George W. Bush/Children did die under Clinton"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New thread: Children did die under Clinton)
 
(clarification; update)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Some edits on the main page claim that "no children died when Clinton lied" is inaccurate; I am moving that discussion here until there is sufficient evidence to conclude whether this claim has merit.
+
Some edits to [[Bill Clinton vs. George W. Bush|the article]] claim that "no children died when Clinton lied" is inaccurate; I am moving that discussion here until there is sufficient evidence to conclude whether this claim has merit.
  
 
The [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton_vs._George_W._Bush&oldid=24421 first edit] added "BUT THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS DIED IN HIS BOMBINGS."
 
The [http://issuepedia.org/index.php?title=Bill_Clinton_vs._George_W._Bush&oldid=24421 first edit] added "BUT THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS DIED IN HIS BOMBINGS."
Line 14: Line 14:
 
...and at least two other large sections of the page were deleted or disabled (accidentally, I presume).
 
...and at least two other large sections of the page were deleted or disabled (accidentally, I presume).
  
I believe these issues have been dealt with in [[Clinton's bad behavior]], but I will check into it shortly.
+
I have addressed these claims below.

Latest revision as of 13:19, 21 May 2011

Some edits to the article claim that "no children died when Clinton lied" is inaccurate; I am moving that discussion here until there is sufficient evidence to conclude whether this claim has merit.

The first edit added "BUT THOUSANDS OF IRAQIS DIED IN HIS BOMBINGS."

After several further edits, we end up with this addition:

Clinton lied about WMDs too. Operation Desert Fox was an attempt to distract the American people from Clinton's own affair.

...and this text added at top of the page:

you dumb liberal bastards...

BILL CLINTON LIED UNDER OATH TO A GRAND JURY, AN ILLEGAL ACTIVITY. HE ALSO ATTEMPTED TO IMPEDE THE PROCESS OF LAW BY WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE THAT WOULD PROVE HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH MONICA LEWINSKY, FORCING LEWINSKY TO SUBMIT A FALSE AFFIVADIT, AND PROLONGING HIS OWN TESTIMONY DURING THE JONES VS. CLINTON CASE. HIS RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MONICA LEWINSKY WAS IMPORTANT TO PROVE HE HAD A PAST OF EXTRAMARITAL AFFAIRS. THIS WAS CRUCIAL EVIDENCE FOR JONES, WHO ACCUSED THE PRESIDENT OF SEXUAL ABUSE.

...and at least two other large sections of the page were deleted or disabled (accidentally, I presume).

I have addressed these claims below.