Difference between revisions of "US/NC"

From Issuepedia
< US
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Limits to Municipal Internet: link to official legislation page)
(misc tidying)
(23 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
==Navigation==
+
<hide>
−
[[category:places]][[countries]]: {{USA}}: [[North Carolina]]
+
[[page type::article]]
−
==Overview==
+
[[thing type::US state]]
 +
[[name::North Carolina]]
 +
[[category:US]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 
This page is for issues local to the state of [[North Carolina]] in the {{USA}}.
 
This page is for issues local to the state of [[North Carolina]] in the {{USA}}.
−
==Active Issues==
+
===Pages===
−
===Stupid Rule for Charter Schools===
+
====local====
−
(To be researched) If you are a charter school in NC, your funding is based entirely (or mostly?) on how many students show up on ''the very first day of school''. The only exception is if a student is actually ''in the hospital''. Even if a student has to be out of town for a vacation planned months and months earlier, they still have to show up for the first day of class for at least three hours, or else they do not count towards the school's enrollment -- and the school is forced by circumstances to give away that student's spot to the next person in line who can be there. (What's more, as long as the student has shown up on the first day, s/he can be absent for months afterward without affecting the school's funding. It's not, then, a matter of having high standards; the rule is simply arbitrary in the extreme.)
+
* {{l/sub|Durham}}
 +
* {{l/sub|Watauga}}
 +
====sub====
 +
* [[/2021/HB/324]]: preventing schools from teaching about racism
 +
* [[/2011/SB/514]]: the "Amendment 1" initiative
 +
* [[/charter schools]]: funding rules are unfair to both charters ''and'' regular public schools
 +
* [[/religious requirement]]: the NC constitution violates the [[US constitution]]
 +
* [[/voting]]: discussion of voting issues in NC
 +
* [[/gov]]: government actions
 +
* '''indexes''':
 +
** [[/2011]]: events in 2011
 +
** [[/2012]]: events in 2012
 +
** [[/elec|elections]]
  
−
The ''regular'' public schools, however, have a '''twenty day window''' in which students may show up in order to be counted towards the school's funding.
+
====related====
 +
* [[Durham, NC]]: issues local to Durham
 +
* [[Blackwater USA]] (aka [[Xe Services LLC]] and [[Academi]]) is a mercenary training company located in NC.
 +
* The [[John Locke Foundation]] is a [[conservoid]] think-tank based in NC and yielding considerable political influence
 +
* [[Art Pope]] is a prominent businessman and funder of [[conservoid]] projects in NC
  
−
It seems obvious that this rule is unfairly biased against charter schools. It only inconveniences a very few people, but the conflict can be massive when it does -- and can end up hurting both the child and the school, depending on what ultimately happens.
 
 
==Past Issues==
 
==Past Issues==
 
===Limits to Municipal Internet===
 
===Limits to Municipal Internet===
 
[http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2007&BillID=H1587 House Bill 1587], aka "The Local Gov't Fair Competition Act" aka the bill to prevent local government from competing "unfairly" with the local internet monopolies (the people who name these things obviously have the same sense of irony as the real-estate developers). This issue appears to be dead for the moment, as the bill has gone to committee &ndash; but don't be surprised if it appears again in another form.
 
[http://www.ncleg.net/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2007&BillID=H1587 House Bill 1587], aka "The Local Gov't Fair Competition Act" aka the bill to prevent local government from competing "unfairly" with the local internet monopolies (the people who name these things obviously have the same sense of irony as the real-estate developers). This issue appears to be dead for the moment, as the bill has gone to committee &ndash; but don't be surprised if it appears again in another form.
 
* '''2007-07-24''' [http://www.markturner.net/2007/07/24/nc-bill-limiting-municipal-internet-effectively-killed/ N.C. Bill Limiting Municipal Internet Effectively Killed!]
 
* '''2007-07-24''' [http://www.markturner.net/2007/07/24/nc-bill-limiting-municipal-internet-effectively-killed/ N.C. Bill Limiting Municipal Internet Effectively Killed!]
 +
===State-Wide Negotiation for Cable Services===
 +
The state has, after much lobbying from the cable industry, apparently passed a law which prevents local municipalities from negotiating with cable companies and instead makes it a state-wide contract. As the state is much less likely to take the time to ensure that each municipality gets what it needs from the cable (e.g. local access programming), this has been a huge victory for the cable companies and monopolistic practices in NC generally.
 +
 +
I have dog-eared a recent issue of the Independent with some details of the consequences, but it hasn't made its way back to my desk yet. (It's also not clear how this affects any cable company ''not'' involved with the contract, but would seem to imply that they are effectively locked out of doing business in the state -- ensuring a statewide monopoly. How is this good?) --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 11:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
* '''2008-10-01''' [http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A265944 What if Durham told its own story?] &ldquo;At the beginning of 2008, the franchise agreement between [[Durham, NC|Durham]]'s government and [[Time Warner Cable]] expired. Because of a state law passed in 2006 with the heavy backing of cable industry lobbyists, Durham couldn't negotiate a new deal to preserve its local cable-access channels. .. Suddenly and without warning, people who had been producing public access TV programs for years were cut off.&rdquo; (The one comment on that article is a good sample of [[neocon reality inversion]]...)
 +
 +
==Links==
 +
===Reference===
 +
* {{wikipedia|North Carolina}}
 +
* {{conservapedia|North Carolina}} (stub as of 2007-08-05)
 +
* {{dkosopedia|North Carolina}}
 +
* {{sourcewatch|Portal:North Carolina and the U.S. Congress}}
 +
* {{htyp}}
 +
* [http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/?source=redirect&url=tolerance-maps-hate#s=NC NC hate groups] at the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]
 +
 +
===Filed Links===
 +
{{links/news}}
 +
===Projects===
 +
* '''2007''' The NC Home Sales Tax: [http://itsabadidea.org/ It's a Bad Idea]
 +
** This appears to be a site created by the [[NC real estate industry]]. The tax was not on "equity" but on the sale of homes, paid by the seller. It's not clear how this is different from an [[impact fee]], but the industry has certainly done its best to get rid of impact fees wherever possible (Durham recently did away with them, 2006?) in spite of the obvious need for impact fees to pay for new infrastructure (utilities, schools, roads...).
 +
*** Where was the real estate industry when Durham raised our property valuations?? That tax hits the people who ''actually live here'', rather than people who are moving in or out of the area. The latter group are already prepared to deal with possibly taking a financial hit as they move from one area to a possibly-more-expensive one on their way up the corporate ladder. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 10:34, 7 August 2008 (EDT), edited 2012-05-09
 +
 +
===Articles===
 +
* '''2007-06-06''' [http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid:155099 Cities fight bill to limit broadband]: "House Bill 1587, "The Local Government Fair Competition Act," is supported by the telecommunications and cable industries, which say cities have unfair advantages—they don't pay taxes and can subsidize a money-losing Internet business with revenue from the city budget. The bill sets out a long list of strict financial and political requirements should a government get into the broadband business. But the N.C. League of Municipalities and a growing number of cities oppose the measure, saying it would effectively make it impossible for local governments to provide Internet service in rural and low-income areas where private industry has decided not to."
 +
* '''2007-04-18''' [http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A88640 A ferry ride to an Orwellian future?] by Peter Eichenberger: a nostalgic field trip turns into some unpleasant discoveries about the [[penal industry]] in NC: the [[River's Correction]] center run by [[GEO Group]], formerly a subsidiary of [[Wackenhut]]; mentions [[Blackwater USA]].
 +
* '''2006-08-16''' [http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A35484 The Vanishing Voter] by [[Bob Geary]], ''The Independent'': [[gerrymandering]] and other systematic political corruption in NC government
 +
===News===
 +
* '''2007-08-05''' [http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/660764.html Campus research hits budget jackpot]: "North Carolina has long been generous in its financial support of universities, and this year is no different. But another thing stands out in the new state budget approved by the legislature: big bucks for research. .. The centerpiece is a cancer research fund at UNC-Chapel Hill -- $25 million in the coming year, growing to $50 million a year starting in 2009."

Revision as of 23:40, 29 April 2022

About

This page is for issues local to the state of North Carolina in the United States.

Pages

local

sub

related

Past Issues

Limits to Municipal Internet

House Bill 1587, aka "The Local Gov't Fair Competition Act" aka the bill to prevent local government from competing "unfairly" with the local internet monopolies (the people who name these things obviously have the same sense of irony as the real-estate developers). This issue appears to be dead for the moment, as the bill has gone to committee – but don't be surprised if it appears again in another form.

State-Wide Negotiation for Cable Services

The state has, after much lobbying from the cable industry, apparently passed a law which prevents local municipalities from negotiating with cable companies and instead makes it a state-wide contract. As the state is much less likely to take the time to ensure that each municipality gets what it needs from the cable (e.g. local access programming), this has been a huge victory for the cable companies and monopolistic practices in NC generally.

I have dog-eared a recent issue of the Independent with some details of the consequences, but it hasn't made its way back to my desk yet. (It's also not clear how this affects any cable company not involved with the contract, but would seem to imply that they are effectively locked out of doing business in the state -- ensuring a statewide monopoly. How is this good?) --Woozle 11:50, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

  • 2008-10-01 What if Durham told its own story? “At the beginning of 2008, the franchise agreement between Durham's government and Time Warner Cable expired. Because of a state law passed in 2006 with the heavy backing of cable industry lobbyists, Durham couldn't negotiate a new deal to preserve its local cable-access channels. .. Suddenly and without warning, people who had been producing public access TV programs for years were cut off.” (The one comment on that article is a good sample of neocon reality inversion...)

Links

Reference

Filed Links

Related


Projects

  • 2007 The NC Home Sales Tax: It's a Bad Idea
    • This appears to be a site created by the NC real estate industry. The tax was not on "equity" but on the sale of homes, paid by the seller. It's not clear how this is different from an impact fee, but the industry has certainly done its best to get rid of impact fees wherever possible (Durham recently did away with them, 2006?) in spite of the obvious need for impact fees to pay for new infrastructure (utilities, schools, roads...).
      • Where was the real estate industry when Durham raised our property valuations?? That tax hits the people who actually live here, rather than people who are moving in or out of the area. The latter group are already prepared to deal with possibly taking a financial hit as they move from one area to a possibly-more-expensive one on their way up the corporate ladder. --Woozle 10:34, 7 August 2008 (EDT), edited 2012-05-09

Articles

  • 2007-06-06 Cities fight bill to limit broadband: "House Bill 1587, "The Local Government Fair Competition Act," is supported by the telecommunications and cable industries, which say cities have unfair advantages—they don't pay taxes and can subsidize a money-losing Internet business with revenue from the city budget. The bill sets out a long list of strict financial and political requirements should a government get into the broadband business. But the N.C. League of Municipalities and a growing number of cities oppose the measure, saying it would effectively make it impossible for local governments to provide Internet service in rural and low-income areas where private industry has decided not to."
  • 2007-04-18 A ferry ride to an Orwellian future? by Peter Eichenberger: a nostalgic field trip turns into some unpleasant discoveries about the penal industry in NC: the River's Correction center run by GEO Group, formerly a subsidiary of Wackenhut; mentions Blackwater USA.
  • 2006-08-16 The Vanishing Voter by Bob Geary, The Independent: gerrymandering and other systematic political corruption in NC government

News

  • 2007-08-05 Campus research hits budget jackpot: "North Carolina has long been generous in its financial support of universities, and this year is no different. But another thing stands out in the new state budget approved by the legislature: big bucks for research. .. The centerpiece is a cancer research fund at UNC-Chapel Hill -- $25 million in the coming year, growing to $50 million a year starting in 2009."
Retrieved from "https://issuepedia.org/mw/index.php?title=US/NC&oldid=70892"