Difference between revisions of "US/Social Security"

From Issuepedia
< US
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(expanded a bit; SSDI stuff moved to subpage)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
<hide>
[[category:United States issues]][[category:poverty]]{{seed}}
+
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::US/gov/program]]
 +
[[category:US/gov]]
 +
</hide>
 +
==About==
 +
{{seed}}
 +
===Pages===
 +
* [[/myths]]: the Social Security program is often attacked on fallacious grounds
 +
* [[/Disability Insurance]]
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
 
* {{wikipedia|Social Security (United States)}}
 
* {{wikipedia|Social Security (United States)}}
 +
* {{conservapedia|Social Security}} "...is strongly endorsed by all major conservative politicians in recent decades, and was expanded by presidents George W. Bush and Dwight D. Eisenhower, and put on a stable financial basis by Ronald Reagan."
 +
* {{dkosopedia|Social Security}}
 +
 +
===Official===
 
* [http://www.ssa.gov/ Social Security Online]: the official web site of the US Social Security Administration
 
* [http://www.ssa.gov/ Social Security Online]: the official web site of the US Social Security Administration
==Notes==
+
{{links/smw}}
===Josh===
 
What we found when we applied for disability benefits for Harena's profoundly autistic son [[htwiki:Josh|Josh]]:
 
 
 
The [http://www.ssa.gov/notices/supplemental-security-income/text-understanding-ssi.htm disability benefits program] has a problem in that one of the requirements for receiving ''any'' assistance is that (essentially) you must have less than $2000 in [http://www.ssa.gov/notices/supplemental-security-income/text-resources-ussi.htm liquid assets] (what they call "resources"), and ''debt is not counted against this total''. This means that if you have $50,000 in debt (credit cards, mortgage, whatever) and $10,000 set aside for emergencies, for a net total of negative $40,000 in "resources", you still do not qualify; you have to get rid of at least $8000 first.
 
 
 
Sinking your "excess" assets into credit card payments is one obvious solution, but this essentially ''forces'' people to put all their eggs in one basket as part of the process of "helping" them, which seems unwise; the rules thus effectively punish people for having any significant quantity of emergency funds &ndash; regardless of source, regardless of demonstrable need, and regardless of net income (gross income less basic expenses &ndash; gross income is taken into account, but not expenses).
 
 
 
The rules don't care if you ''eventually'' end up costing the system more, they just want to make sure you are completely on your knees before they will start to help you up.
 
 
 
There are probably much more egregious injustices in this system, but this is one with which I recently had personal experience. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:02, 25 January 2007 (EST)
 

Latest revision as of 23:06, 12 April 2014