Difference between revisions of "US/pol/Republican"

From Issuepedia
< US‎ | pol
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Actions: Contract with America soon to be local article)
(retired generals criticize GOP and Iraq strategy)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* '''1995''': Republican-led Congress Closed the [http://www.access.gpo.gov/ota/ Office of Technology Assessment]
 
* '''1995''': Republican-led Congress Closed the [http://www.access.gpo.gov/ota/ Office of Technology Assessment]
 
* '''1994''': The [[Contract with America]] was a significant Republican platform in the 1994 Congressional election
 
* '''1994''': The [[Contract with America]] was a significant Republican platform in the 1994 Congressional election
 
 
==Qualities==
 
==Qualities==
 
* Seemingly hostile towards [[science]] [http://www.davidbrin.com/gopwar.html], while the [[US Democratic Party|Democrats]] tend to be opposed to large engineering projects
 
* Seemingly hostile towards [[science]] [http://www.davidbrin.com/gopwar.html], while the [[US Democratic Party|Democrats]] tend to be opposed to large engineering projects
 
* Known for pointlessly "dirty" campaigning [http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/36452/]
 
* Known for pointlessly "dirty" campaigning [http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/36452/]
==Dirty Campaigning==
+
==Links==
 +
===Dirty Campaigning===
 
* '''2006''' [http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/11/republican-fake-phone-call-scandal.html][http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2006/11/more_fun_from_t.html]:
 
* '''2006''' [http://americablog.blogspot.com/2006/11/republican-fake-phone-call-scandal.html][http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2006/11/more_fun_from_t.html]:
 
** [http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/15898729.htm Philadelphia, PA]
 
** [http://www.philly.com/mld/dailynews/news/local/15898729.htm Philadelphia, PA]
Line 21: Line 21:
 
** [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010829.php Connecticut]
 
** [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010829.php Connecticut]
 
** [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010829.php New York]
 
** [http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/010829.php New York]
 
+
===Commentary===
==Commentary==
 
 
* '''2006-10-31''' [http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=7551 This Is No Fun]: right-wing blogger [[John Cole]] shreds the recent performance of the GOP
 
* '''2006-10-31''' [http://www.balloon-juice.com/?p=7551 This Is No Fun]: right-wing blogger [[John Cole]] shreds the recent performance of the GOP
 
* '''2005-11-14''' [http://www.claremont.org/writings/051031wolfson.html Is the GOP still the conservative party?]
 
* '''2005-11-14''' [http://www.claremont.org/writings/051031wolfson.html Is the GOP still the conservative party?]
 
* [http://shelleytherepublican.com/ ShelleyTheRepublican.com]: ok, I confess... I can't tell if this is meant to be serious...
 
* [http://shelleytherepublican.com/ ShelleyTheRepublican.com]: ok, I confess... I can't tell if this is meant to be serious...
 
* [http://republicansforhumility.com Republicans for Humility]
 
* [http://republicansforhumility.com Republicans for Humility]
 
+
===News===
 +
* '''2007-05-09''' [http://www.comcast.net/news/national/index.jsp?cat=DOMESTIC&fn=/2007/05/09/658970.html Retired Generals Challenge GOP in Ads]: "Three retired generals challenged a dozen members of Congress in a new ad campaign Wednesday, saying the politicians can't expect to win re-election if they support President [[George W. Bush|Bush]]'s policies in [[US invasion of Iraq|Iraq]]." The generals in question are Maj. Gen. [[John Batiste]] (ret.), Maj. Gen. [[Paul Eaton]] (ret.), and NATO Supreme Allied Commander [[Wesley Clark]] (ret.); the ads were created by [http://votevets.org VoteVets.org].
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
*[[2000-2007 US Presidential Administration]]
 
*[[2000-2007 US Presidential Administration]]

Revision as of 11:10, 10 May 2007

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Reference

Related Pages

Actions

Qualities

  • Seemingly hostile towards science [1], while the Democrats tend to be opposed to large engineering projects
  • Known for pointlessly "dirty" campaigning [2]

Links

Dirty Campaigning

Commentary

News

See Also