Difference between revisions of "USA PATRIOT Act"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Symptoms Of Yeast Infection)
m (Reverted edits by 91.201.66.34 (Talk) to last revision by Woozle)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
===Filed Links===
 
===Filed Links===
 
{{links.tagged}}
 
{{links.tagged}}
Hi everyone
+
===Discussion===
 
+
* '''2007-06-12''' [http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/to-catch-a-wolf To Catch a Wolf: How to Stop Conservative Frames in Their Tracks] by Christina Smith: second section ("The Question of Terrorism") discusses how [[Wolf Blitzer]] phrased a question to [[Dennis Kucinich]] about the Patriot Act in such a way that he was able to slip many assumptions in without further discussion: "First, and perhaps most importantly, the question assumed that the plot was indeed serious and was not ... disorganized and disgruntled citizens who were hapless and harmless. Second, the question assumed that the plot was only foiled due to the provisions of the Patriot Act – not community cooperation or police work. Third, the question lumped all Patriot Act provisions together under the banner of necessity. Many provisions in the Patriot Act are indeed beneficial and needed. However, many more are a clear violation of civil rights – Blitzer's question did not reveal these disparities. Fourth, the language "tough measure" and "terrorists out there" represented the Bush administration exactly as the President wanted: The Republicans are tough (hence the Democrats are weak), and there is real evil immediately threatening us (and the Democrats are too weak to protect us). ... Finally, the question suggested that the trampling of civil rights through this "tough measure to deal with potential terrorists" is virtuous and worthy of being commended. Since the plot was foiled – Blitzer's question implied that the Patriot Act is an effective measure to fight terrorists – and is therefore worth the destruction of civil rights."
http://www.symptomsofyeastinfection.biz/
 
 
 
So what are the most typical candida yeast infection symptoms.
 
Yeast infection symptoms are your body's approach of telling you that something is not right. Yeast infection signs range widely depending on the location of infection.
 
 
 
Signs
 
 
 
Persistent symptoms needs to be evaluated by your gynecologist or major health care provider. power Candidiasis is a systemic yeast infection with a wide range of symptoms including fatigue, low vitality, muscle aches, headaches and more. Yeast infection signs:rashthick, white pasty residuewhite/yellow cheese-like discharge from vagina (vaginal candidiasis)burning, itching, redness, inflammation of vaginal area (vaginal candidiasis)bright red rash (pores and skin & anal candidiasis)intense itch and burn (pores and skin & anal candidiasis)creamy white, painful patches on mouth floor (thrush, mouth candidiasis)rashVaginal candidiasis happens extra continuously in pregnant girls, obese woman, or women with diabetes or taking antibiotics.
 
 
 
Shade
 
 
 
In females a vaginal yeast infection is characterised by a pasty white colored discharge. When the additional tissue can not simply be wiped off and appears to be considerably discolored on account of staining attributable to meals or tobacco, it factors to chronic hyperplastic. When you've got ever had a yeast infection you realize that it itches, it's or generally is a rash, pink or white in color, depending on the place it is on the physique, there's additionally pain in urination, discharge and typically an odor.
 
 
 
Skin
 
 
 
Our skin surface is made to act as a barrier to micro organism, but if one thing breaks that surface; a lower or a scratch; it gives the micro organism a technique to get in. In men it is characterised by red patchy sores near the head of the penis close to or under the foreskin. If it occurs on the pores and skin, it will be called pores and skin yeast infection. The fungi usually reside on the surface of the skin but after multiplying and additional growth they typically break down the skin causing the appearance of a pink flat rash.
 
 
 
http://www.symptomsofyeastinfection.biz/symptoms-of-yeast-infection-in-men/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Bye to everyone  !
 
 
 
 
===News===
 
===News===
 
* '''2006-02-28''' [http://www.nysun.com/article/28232 Patriot Act E-Mail Searches Apply to Non-Terrorists, Judges Say] by Josh Gerstein, The New York Sun
 
* '''2006-02-28''' [http://www.nysun.com/article/28232 Patriot Act E-Mail Searches Apply to Non-Terrorists, Judges Say] by Josh Gerstein, The New York Sun

Revision as of 21:24, 13 January 2011

Overview

The USA PATRIOT Act, commonly referred to as the "Patriot Act", was introduced to the 107th US Congress House of Representatives on October 23, 2001, where it passed with a vote of 357 to 66 (the motion was to suspend the rules and pass the bill) on October 24; all but two senators voted "Yea" (Russ Feingold voted "Nay" and Mary Landrieu did not vote) on October 25, and it was signed into U.S. law by President George W. Bush on October 26.

Its official description is "A bill to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes."

Workarounds

rsync.net seems to have come up with the idea of a "warrant canary", which gets around the provision prohibiting businesses from notifying their customers if they have been served a warrant by maintaining a notice stating that they haven't yet been served and promising to remove the notice if they ever are served: [1]

notes

  • It's not clear which part of the Act relates to this; possibly the section in the 2005 reauthorization entitled "SEC. 106. ACCESS TO CERTAIN BUSINESS RECORDS UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT." To be researched later.
  • thomas.loc.gov NEEDS a way to get a permanent link to documents found from a search!!! Wikipedia currently links to expired searches for all the 2005 Reauthorization stuff. (In the meantime, of course, we can feel free to transcribe stuff into Issuepedia... this makes it much more readable, but is still a lot of work.)

Links

Official

Reference

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

Discussion

  • 2007-06-12 To Catch a Wolf: How to Stop Conservative Frames in Their Tracks by Christina Smith: second section ("The Question of Terrorism") discusses how Wolf Blitzer phrased a question to Dennis Kucinich about the Patriot Act in such a way that he was able to slip many assumptions in without further discussion: "First, and perhaps most importantly, the question assumed that the plot was indeed serious and was not ... disorganized and disgruntled citizens who were hapless and harmless. Second, the question assumed that the plot was only foiled due to the provisions of the Patriot Act – not community cooperation or police work. Third, the question lumped all Patriot Act provisions together under the banner of necessity. Many provisions in the Patriot Act are indeed beneficial and needed. However, many more are a clear violation of civil rights – Blitzer's question did not reveal these disparities. Fourth, the language "tough measure" and "terrorists out there" represented the Bush administration exactly as the President wanted: The Republicans are tough (hence the Democrats are weak), and there is real evil immediately threatening us (and the Democrats are too weak to protect us). ... Finally, the question suggested that the trampling of civil rights through this "tough measure to deal with potential terrorists" is virtuous and worthy of being commended. Since the plot was foiled – Blitzer's question implied that the Patriot Act is an effective measure to fight terrorists – and is therefore worth the destruction of civil rights."

News

Video

  • Bullshit! by Penn & Teller (first half is about PATRIOT, second half is about surveillance)
    • "other purposes" as a legal phrase
    • most of the reps who voted for the act didn't read it
    • gives right to get lists of books checked out by library patrons without their notification
    • trials on offshore barges
    • we are at war ?? libraries as sanctuaries for terror?
    • Bob Barr, republican who voted for the act, now regrets his vote
    • cameras didn't stop the terrorists; armed passengers could have stopped them