Difference between revisions of "USA PATRIOT Act"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(yeast infection during pregnancy)
m (Reverted edits by 91.201.66.34 (Talk) to last revision by Woozle)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
===Filed Links===
 
===Filed Links===
 
{{links.tagged}}
 
{{links.tagged}}
Hey there!
+
===Discussion===
 
+
* '''2007-06-12''' [http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/to-catch-a-wolf To Catch a Wolf: How to Stop Conservative Frames in Their Tracks] by Christina Smith: second section ("The Question of Terrorism") discusses how [[Wolf Blitzer]] phrased a question to [[Dennis Kucinich]] about the Patriot Act in such a way that he was able to slip many assumptions in without further discussion: "First, and perhaps most importantly, the question assumed that the plot was indeed serious and was not ... disorganized and disgruntled citizens who were hapless and harmless. Second, the question assumed that the plot was only foiled due to the provisions of the Patriot Act – not community cooperation or police work. Third, the question lumped all Patriot Act provisions together under the banner of necessity. Many provisions in the Patriot Act are indeed beneficial and needed. However, many more are a clear violation of civil rights – Blitzer's question did not reveal these disparities. Fourth, the language "tough measure" and "terrorists out there" represented the Bush administration exactly as the President wanted: The Republicans are tough (hence the Democrats are weak), and there is real evil immediately threatening us (and the Democrats are too weak to protect us). ... Finally, the question suggested that the trampling of civil rights through this "tough measure to deal with potential terrorists" is virtuous and worthy of being commended. Since the plot was foiled – Blitzer's question implied that the Patriot Act is an effective measure to fight terrorists – and is therefore worth the destruction of civil rights."
http://www.symptomsofyeastinfection.biz/
 
 
 
Are you looking for information on how to eliminate a yeast infection? In that case, you're both suffering from a female, male or oral (thrush) candida yeast infection. One symptom that all of those conditions have in widespread are sores and blisters both in the vagina, the penis or the mouth. In the case of penile candida infections or vaginal candida infections, extra signs are burning and itching from rashes within the genitals.  
 
This article will describe learn how to treat a yeast an infection from candida yeast.
 
 
 
Get Rid Of a Yeast Infection With Prescription Or Over The Counter Treatments
 
If that is your first candida infection, you may discover some success with over the counter treatments or treatments that were prescribed by your doctor. These cures
 
would most likely include ointments, creams and antibiotics that have antifungal substances that assist to kill yeast. Examples of some products could be Miconazole, Clotrimazole, Tioconazole or Butoconazole. Miconazole vaginal cream is the generic name for the model names Monistat three, Femizole-M and Monistat 7.
 
Miconazole or Monistat or Miconazole are antifungals which are used as a suppository or vaginal cream. They're used to deal with the most common types of yeast infection because of the Candida fungus. These products all relieve the burning and itching symptoms which can be widespread with yeast infections of the vagina or the penis.
 
The products are often given in therapy programs of 1 (prescription only), 3 or 7 days.
 
 
 
Get Rid Of a Yeast Infection With Natural Cures
 
 
 
Not everyone's body responds nicely to exterior medications for candida. Or - maybe the remedy momentary solves the itching and burning problem, only to have the yeast reoccur with signs worse than before. If so for you, perhaps it is time to consider some natural remedies which your body might reply to in a more optimistic way.  
 
One very common pure treatment to make use of to do away with your candida is yogurt.
 
Not simply any yogurt, however - plain, unpasteurized, unflavored, non-sugar yogurt. You possibly can eat this in as giant portions as you'll be able to stand. The acidophilus that is likely one of the major yogurt ingredients works to fight yeast with some 'good micro organism' that's effective at neutralizing the Ph imbalance of candida cells in your body. Other natural cures to contemplate are tea tree oil and apple cider vinegar which can be applied internally (as a douche) for vaginal yeast infections, topically for both penile and female sores and lesions. Apple cider vinegar can be utilized in a gargling resolution as a treatment for oral thrush.
 
 
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ_MeAHsVss
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkI_ZCClH7M
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tNMp8Lhu6g
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqT5wRwquRU
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nAnPjNz-I4
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0Br2P2AENo
 
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaPrhcmTMzY
 
 
 
http://www.symptomsofyeastinfection.biz/symptoms-of-yeast-infection-in-dogs/
 
http://www.symptomsofyeastinfection.biz/symptoms-of-yeast-infection-in-dogs-2/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Bye to everyone  !
 
 
 
 
===News===
 
===News===
 
* '''2006-02-28''' [http://www.nysun.com/article/28232 Patriot Act E-Mail Searches Apply to Non-Terrorists, Judges Say] by Josh Gerstein, The New York Sun
 
* '''2006-02-28''' [http://www.nysun.com/article/28232 Patriot Act E-Mail Searches Apply to Non-Terrorists, Judges Say] by Josh Gerstein, The New York Sun

Revision as of 02:35, 22 January 2011

Overview

The USA PATRIOT Act, commonly referred to as the "Patriot Act", was introduced to the 107th US Congress House of Representatives on October 23, 2001, where it passed with a vote of 357 to 66 (the motion was to suspend the rules and pass the bill) on October 24; all but two senators voted "Yea" (Russ Feingold voted "Nay" and Mary Landrieu did not vote) on October 25, and it was signed into U.S. law by President George W. Bush on October 26.

Its official description is "A bill to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes."

Workarounds

rsync.net seems to have come up with the idea of a "warrant canary", which gets around the provision prohibiting businesses from notifying their customers if they have been served a warrant by maintaining a notice stating that they haven't yet been served and promising to remove the notice if they ever are served: [1]

notes

  • It's not clear which part of the Act relates to this; possibly the section in the 2005 reauthorization entitled "SEC. 106. ACCESS TO CERTAIN BUSINESS RECORDS UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT." To be researched later.
  • thomas.loc.gov NEEDS a way to get a permanent link to documents found from a search!!! Wikipedia currently links to expired searches for all the 2005 Reauthorization stuff. (In the meantime, of course, we can feel free to transcribe stuff into Issuepedia... this makes it much more readable, but is still a lot of work.)

Links

Official

Reference

Filed Links

  1. redirect template:links/smw

Discussion

  • 2007-06-12 To Catch a Wolf: How to Stop Conservative Frames in Their Tracks by Christina Smith: second section ("The Question of Terrorism") discusses how Wolf Blitzer phrased a question to Dennis Kucinich about the Patriot Act in such a way that he was able to slip many assumptions in without further discussion: "First, and perhaps most importantly, the question assumed that the plot was indeed serious and was not ... disorganized and disgruntled citizens who were hapless and harmless. Second, the question assumed that the plot was only foiled due to the provisions of the Patriot Act – not community cooperation or police work. Third, the question lumped all Patriot Act provisions together under the banner of necessity. Many provisions in the Patriot Act are indeed beneficial and needed. However, many more are a clear violation of civil rights – Blitzer's question did not reveal these disparities. Fourth, the language "tough measure" and "terrorists out there" represented the Bush administration exactly as the President wanted: The Republicans are tough (hence the Democrats are weak), and there is real evil immediately threatening us (and the Democrats are too weak to protect us). ... Finally, the question suggested that the trampling of civil rights through this "tough measure to deal with potential terrorists" is virtuous and worthy of being commended. Since the plot was foiled – Blitzer's question implied that the Patriot Act is an effective measure to fight terrorists – and is therefore worth the destruction of civil rights."

News

Video

  • Bullshit! by Penn & Teller (first half is about PATRIOT, second half is about surveillance)
    • "other purposes" as a legal phrase
    • most of the reps who voted for the act didn't read it
    • gives right to get lists of books checked out by library patrons without their notification
    • trials on offshore barges
    • we are at war ?? libraries as sanctuaries for terror?
    • Bob Barr, republican who voted for the act, now regrets his vote
    • cameras didn't stop the terrorists; armed passengers could have stopped them