Difference between revisions of "US Constitution"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Links: moved Ritter link to Filed Links; added Filed Links section)
(Undo revision 17317 by (Talk))
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
* {{dkosopedia}}
* {{dkosopedia}}
* {{sourcewatch}}
* {{sourcewatch}}
* LessigWiki: [[lessigwiki:Article V Convention|Article V Convention]] - a discussion of rules for amending the Constitution
* [http://www.constitutioncenter.org/ National Constitution Center] in Philadelphia, PA: museum
* [http://www.constitutioncenter.org/ National Constitution Center] in Philadelphia, PA: museum

Latest revision as of 23:15, 22 July 2009


This article is a seed. You can help Issuepedia by watering it.




  • National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, PA: museum
    • "Interactive" Constitution": seems to be a bit of a misnomer, as the only interactivity is selecting which part of the constitution you want explained, but is useful in that it does have capsule summaries of the generally accepted meaning of each part of the Constitution as well as some of the significant concepts to which it refers.


Filed Links

version 3

  • 2013-12-10 [L..T] Give Me Amendments or Give Me Death "Inside the secretive campaign by state legislators to pass conservative amendments in 34 states and rewrite the Constitution."
  • 2011-05-13 [L..T] Court denies right to resist illegal cop entry into home “Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes. .. In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry.”
  • 1988-09-16 [L..T] Originalism: The Lesser Evil "The principal theoretical defect of nonoriginalism, in my view, is its incompatibility with the very principle that legitimizes judicial review of constitutionality. Nothing in the text of the Constitution confers upon the courts the power to inquire into, rather than passively assume, the constitutionality of federal statutes."

version 2