Difference between revisions of "US military spending"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Positions: Pournelle citation) |
m (catg: pages needing help) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
| − | [[category:statistics]]{{USA}} [[US Democratic Party|Democrats]] and [[liberal]]s are frequently criticized as being anti-military, with the correlation between military spending and presidential party affiliation being offered as evidence. There is clearly a correlation, and further analysis is needed, but it should be noted that (for example) military spending declined significantly under [[George H.W. Bush]] and grew under [[Jimmy Carter]]. Overall, there has been a mostly-steady decline in military spending since the end of World War II, rather than a clear oscillation between low [[US Democratic Party|Democratic]] spending levels and higher [[US Republican Party|Republican]] ones. | + | [[category:pages needing help]][[category:statistics]]{{USA}} [[US Democratic Party|Democrats]] and [[liberal]]s are frequently criticized as being anti-military, with the correlation between military spending and presidential party affiliation being offered as evidence. There is clearly a correlation, and further analysis is needed, but it should be noted that (for example) military spending declined significantly under [[George H.W. Bush]] and grew under [[Jimmy Carter]]. Overall, there has been a mostly-steady decline in military spending since the end of World War II, rather than a clear oscillation between low [[US Democratic Party|Democratic]] spending levels and higher [[US Republican Party|Republican]] ones. |
==Military budgets by president== | ==Military budgets by president== | ||
Changeover years are credited to both outgoing and incoming presidents. GDP = Gross Domestic Product; DS = Discretionary Spending. Source: [http://www.truthandpolitics.org/military-relative-size.php truthandpolitics.org] | Changeover years are credited to both outgoing and incoming presidents. GDP = Gross Domestic Product; DS = Discretionary Spending. Source: [http://www.truthandpolitics.org/military-relative-size.php truthandpolitics.org] | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 22 April 2007
Overview
United States Democrats and liberals are frequently criticized as being anti-military, with the correlation between military spending and presidential party affiliation being offered as evidence. There is clearly a correlation, and further analysis is needed, but it should be noted that (for example) military spending declined significantly under George H.W. Bush and grew under Jimmy Carter. Overall, there has been a mostly-steady decline in military spending since the end of World War II, rather than a clear oscillation between low Democratic spending levels and higher Republican ones.
Military budgets by president
Changeover years are credited to both outgoing and incoming presidents. GDP = Gross Domestic Product; DS = Discretionary Spending. Source: truthandpolitics.org
| President | Years | Party | % of GDP | % of DS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill Clinton | 1993-2001 | D | Template:Expr: (4.4+4.0+3.7+3.5+3.3+3.1+3.0+3.0+3.0)/9 (4.4, 4.0, 3.7, 3.5, 3.3, 3.1, 3.0, 3.0, 3.0) |
Template:Expr: (54.2+52.1+50.2+49.9+49.6+48.9+48.2+48.0+47.1)/9 (54.2, 52.1, 50.2, 49.9, 49.6, 48.9, 48.2, 48.0, 47.1) |
| George H.W. Bush | 1989-1993 | R | Template:Expr: (5.6+5.2+4.6+4.8+4.4)/5 (5.6, 5.2, 4.6, 4.8, 4.4) |
Template:Expr: (62.2+60.0+59.9+56.7+54.2)/5 (62.2, 60.0, 59.9, 56.7, 54.2) |
| Ronald Reagan | 1981-1989 | R | Template:Expr: (5.1+5.7+6.1+5.9+6.1+6.2+6.1+5.8+5.6)/9 (5.1, 5.7, 6.1, 5.9, 6.1, 6.2, 6.1, 5.8, 5.6) |
Template:Expr: (51.3+57.0+59.4+60.1+60.9+62.4+63.6+62.6+62.2)/9 (51.3, 57.0, 59.4, 60.1, 60.9, 62.4, 63.6, 62.6, 62.2) |
| Jimmy Carter | 1977-1981 | D | Template:Expr: (4.9+4.7+4.6+4.9+5.1)/5 (4.9, 4.7, 4.6, 4.9, 5.1) |
Template:Expr: (49.5+47.8+48.7+48.7+51.3)/5 (49.5, 47.8, 48.7, 48.7, 51.3) |
Reference
Positions
- "Republics have large paid standing armies at their peril. The peril may be adventurism and imperialism ("What's the use of having this powerful army if we can't use it?") or something worse, but the result is never very good. When recruitment becomes an important military activity there's something wrong." – Jerry Pournelle [1], conservative author