Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Evolution vs. Intelligent Design"

From Issuepedia
(restored from diff (previous versions were coming up blank after ampersandbot deleted most of article -- wtf?))
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Evolution vs. Intelligent Design]]: a biased analysis  
+
[http://snailtail.cn/yeah-feat/index.html yeah feat usher] [http://snailtail.cn/xenya/index.html xenya] [http://kitmun.cn/yugi-oh.html yugi oh] [http://babychams.fast-road.cn/index.html baby chams] [http://berteinaltomare.clung.cn/index.html berte in alto mare] [http://quoits.cn/zombies.html zombies cranberries] [http://buchholzhotel.clung.cn/index.html buchholz hotel] [http://boschi.kittiss.cn/index.html boschi] [http://kitmun.cn/your-latest.html your latest trick] [http://quoits.cn/zia-forli.html zia forli] [http://quoits.cn/apocalisse.html apocalisse sul fiume giallo] [http://snailtail.cn/y-tu-que-has/index.html y tu que has hecho] [http://snailtail.cn/www-tg-com/index.html www tg com it] [http://kitmun.cn/zampogne.html zampogne] [http://quoits.cn/zelig-wav.html zelig wav] [http://bluespanisheyestestoinita.clung.cn/index.html blue spanish eyes testo in ita] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-trombare/index.html www trombare] [http://snailtail.cn/www-pioggia/index.html www pioggia dorata it] [http://bielovar.kittiss.cn/index.html bielovar] [http://kitmun.cn/yesterday.html yesterday paul mccartney] [http://quoits.cn/zadok-the.html zadok the priest of tony britten] [http://knock-knock.cn/winzip-italiano/index.html winzip italiano] [http://quoits.cn/zambrone.html zambrone] [http://basemusicalelagatta.kittiss.cn/index.html base musicale la gatta] [http://snailtail.cn/x-me-importante/index.html x me importante] [http://quoits.cn/andate.html andate al west] [http://bollettinoufficialedellaregioneumbri.clung.cn/index.html bollettino ufficiale della regione umbri] [http://wonted.cn/wwwferdinandofama/index.html wwwferdinandofama com] [http://wonted.cn/www-rofrano/index.html www rofrano it] [http://benassibrosfeatdhany.kittiss.cn/index.html benassi bros feat dhany] [http://kitmun.cn/zahouania.html zahouania] [http://wonted.cn/www-yau-it/index.html www yau it] [http://bsb.midways.cn/index.html bsb] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-gry/index.html www gry pl] [http://bindiyachamkegi.fast-road.cn/index.html bindiya chamkegi] [http://wonted.cn/www-algare/index.html www algare com] [http://snailtail.cn/www-gewiss-it/index.html www gewiss it] [http://quoits.cn/arrivano-i-carri.html arrivano i carri armati] [http://bakstagecalendari.fast-road.cn/index.html bakstage calendari] [http://bubbles.kittiss.cn/index.html bubbles] [http://barbatulideal.clung.cn/index.html barbatul ideal] [http://quoits.cn/anni-verdi.html anni verdi] [http://wonted.cn/www-gusanito/index.html www gusanito com mx] [http://borntobealivephernandez.clung.cn/index.html born to be alive p hernandez] [http://wonted.cn/www-aido/index.html www aido it] [http://kitmun.cn/zayon-y.html zayon y lenox] [http://ballafigliola.romanikki.cn/index.html balla figliola] [http://beatrizrico.kittiss.cn/index.html beatriz rico] [http://bigtitts.fast-road.cn/index.html big titts] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-symantic/index.html www symantic com] [http://bluedubblin.midways.cn/index.html blue dubblin] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-matildebrandi/index.html www matildebrandi it] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-max-rcs/index.html www max rcs] [http://blofcountingcrowsholidayinspain.fast-road.cn/index.html blof counting crows holiday in spain] [http://blackeyedshutup.midways.cn/index.html black eyed shut up] [http://brasilianiagenova.clung.cn/index.html brasiliani a genova] [http://quoits.cn/ziberna.html ziberna] [http://snailtail.cn/yin/index.html yin] [http://basilicatanet.clung.cn/index.html basilicatanet] [http://barbeepizzetti.midways.cn/index.html barbe e pizzetti] [http://bertolucci.midways.cn/index.html bertolucci] [http://brendacarvalo.midways.cn/index.html brenda carvalo] [http://kitmun.cn/yeu.html yeu] [http://wonted.cn/www-moby/index.html www moby it] [http://basikaraokedisalsa.clung.cn/index.html basi karaoke di salsa] [http://binbaubassachebassa.fast-road.cn/index.html bin bau bassa che bassa] [http://snailtail.cn/yamaha-r1/index.html yamaha r1] [http://begley.romanikki.cn/index.html begley] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-iata/index.html www iata org] [http://barbaradursosexsextopless.kittiss.cn/index.html barbara durso sex sex topless] [http://snailtail.cn/yhaoomessenger/index.html yhaoomessenger] [http://snailtail.cn/xxx-pron-anime/index.html xxx pron anime] [http://bicrunga.kittiss.cn/index.html bic runga] [http://bibbiapernokia.midways.cn/index.html bibbia per nokia] [http://bigliettiniaugurimatriomonio.fast-road.cn/index.html bigliettini auguri matriomonio] [http://bonnietylerandkareenantonn.clung.cn/index.html bonnie tyler and kareen antonn] [http://snailtail.cn/xxx-gay/index.html xxx gay] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-ornela/index.html www ornela vorpsi] [http://wonted.cn/www-quattroruote/index.html www quattroruote it] [http://quoits.cn/a-caccia-di-spie.html a caccia di spie] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-modelle/index.html www modelle it] [http://quoits.cn/zero-reticoli.html zero reticoli] [http://wonted.cn/www-joker/index.html www joker it] [http://snailtail.cn/x-win32/index.html x win32] [http://bia322y.romanikki.cn/index.html bia 322 y] [http://battagliaterme.romanikki.cn/index.html battagliaterme] [http://bluespartiti.clung.cn/index.html blue spartiti] [http://birckenstockheidiklum.kittiss.cn/index.html birckenstock heidi klum] [http://ballandoalbuoio.fast-road.cn/index.html ballando al buoio] [http://wonted.cn/www-kings-of/index.html www kings of convinience it] [http://britneyhomepage.fast-road.cn/index.html britney home page] [http://quoits.cn/assicurasi.html assicurasi vergine] [http://kitmun.cn/zeta-zero-alfa.html zeta zero alfa] [http://quoits.cn/amanti.html amanti in fuga] [http://snailtail.cn/www-sanpaolo/index.html www sanpaolo banco di napoli] [http://wonted.cn/wilkommen/index.html wilkommen] [http://wonted.cn/www-roadrunner/index.html www roadrunner com] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-bramkasms/index.html www bramkasms pl] [http://babyrastaygringosentenciado.fast-road.cn/index.html baby rasta y gringo sentenciado] [http://knock-knock.cn/w-w-w-mani/index.html w w w mani tese it] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-nido-hotel/index.html www nido hotel com] [http://quoits.cn/arizona-si.html arizona si scatenò... e li fece fuori tutti!] [http://kitmun.cn/yozo-kaka.html yozo kaka ritka] [http://bonytailor.clung.cn/index.html bony tailor] [http://quoits.cn/agenzia-matrimoniale.html agenzia matrimoniale "a"] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-luigi/index.html www luigi interfree it] [http://bonytaylor.midways.cn/index.html bony taylor] [http://quoits.cn/atto-d'amore.html atto d'amore - il magnifico disertore] [http://wonted.cn/www-makelovetome/index.html www makelovetome com] [http://biografytotti.midways.cn/index.html biografy totti] [http://wonted.cn/www-neuromed/index.html www neuromed] [http://benassimidi.fast-road.cn/index.html benassi midi] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-coscienza/index.html www coscienza org] [http://bellequarantenni.kittiss.cn/index.html belle quarantenni] [http://snailtail.cn/xatzigiann/index.html xatzigiann] [http://brazil.fast-road.cn/index.html brazil] [http://kitmun.cn/you-and-i.html you and i] [http://snailtail.cn/y-hubo-alguien/index.html y hubo alguien] [http://snailtail.cn/xcrypt/index.html xcrypt] [http://snailtail.cn/x-goe-give-to/index.html x goe give to ya] [http://wonted.cn/www-aol/index.html www aol] [http://bellezzedellatv.romanikki.cn/index.html bellezze della tv] [http://bailagigidalessio.midways.cn/index.html baila gigi d alessio] [http://bagnimojito.clung.cn/index.html bagnimojito] [http://bennatomediterraneo.midways.cn/index.html bennato mediterraneo] [http://barbarie21settenbre.kittiss.cn/index.html barbarie 21 settenbre] [http://basiremix.fast-road.cn/index.html basi remix] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-triangolo/index.html www triangolo delle bermuda it] [http://berlusconiconlabandana.clung.cn/index.html berlusconi con la bandana] [http://bahibakmoot.clung.cn/index.html bahibak moot] [http://snailtail.cn/xutos/index.html xutos] [http://boccadimagra.midways.cn/index.html bocca di magra] [http://bungalowcampania2persone.clung.cn/index.html bungalow campania 2 persone] [http://bayerserieh.romanikki.cn/index.html bayer serie h] [http://bigcocks.romanikki.cn/index.html big cocks] [http://kitmun.cn/ymne-a-l-amour.html ymne a l amour] [http://biografiacostantinovitigliano.kittiss.cn/index.html biografia costantino vitigliano] [http://wonted.cn/willy-denzer/index.html willy denzer] [http://kitmun.cn/yaouu.html yaouu] [http://borseburberry.clung.cn/index.html borse burberry] [http://bussicilia.midways.cn/index.html bus sicilia] [http://kitmun.cn/zir.html zir] [http://wonted.cn/www-strano/index.html www strano it] [http://bacioamezzanotte.romanikki.cn/index.html bacio a mezzanotte] [http://bulldozer.romanikki.cn/index.html bulldozer] [http://knock-knock.cn/www-istruzione/index.html www istruzione pg] [http://bluvacanze.fast-road.cn/index.html blu vacanze] [http://basimusicalifilm.clung.cn/index.html basi musicali film] [http://bestsellers.midways.cn/index.html best sellers] [http://wonted.cn/www-unpostoalsole/index.html www unpostoalsole org] [[Evolution vs. Intelligent Design]]: a biased analysis  
  
 
'''2007-06-05 Notes''': This was written at a time when I hadn't yet extensively researched the situation. My conclusion now is more along the lines of "ID is just a thinly-disguised veneer of scientific-sounding language layered on top of creationism. Evolution may be just a theory, but it is a [[scientific theory]]; ID is, at best, an [[informal theory]], and the more you try to get an ID supporter to define their terms or be specific, the more evasions you get. IDers and creationists believe what they believe because it fits ''what they want to believe'', not because it's what the evidence shows."
 
'''2007-06-05 Notes''': This was written at a time when I hadn't yet extensively researched the situation. My conclusion now is more along the lines of "ID is just a thinly-disguised veneer of scientific-sounding language layered on top of creationism. Evolution may be just a theory, but it is a [[scientific theory]]; ID is, at best, an [[informal theory]], and the more you try to get an ID supporter to define their terms or be specific, the more evasions you get. IDers and creationists believe what they believe because it fits ''what they want to believe'', not because it's what the evidence shows."
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* The scientists need to admit that just because something doesn't have a lot of supporting data doesn't mean it isn't (or couldn't be) true, although it may well mean that it is highly unlikely. They also need to admit that we don't yet know enough about the universe to say that it couldn't have been (or wasn't) designed by an intelligent being.
 
* The scientists need to admit that just because something doesn't have a lot of supporting data doesn't mean it isn't (or couldn't be) true, although it may well mean that it is highly unlikely. They also need to admit that we don't yet know enough about the universe to say that it couldn't have been (or wasn't) designed by an intelligent being.
 
* The ID folks need to admit that until they have a specific theoretical argument with some testable conclusions, postulating an intelligent entity (which itself would need to be explained) when there are other simpler explanations is, as they say, making things unnecessarily complicated*.{{sidenote|*'''complicated''': see [[Wikipedia:Occam's Razor|Occam's Razor]], a principle attributed to a 14th-century Franciscan friar who apparently agreed that it made proving the existence of God rather iffy [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15636a.htm]}}  
 
* The ID folks need to admit that until they have a specific theoretical argument with some testable conclusions, postulating an intelligent entity (which itself would need to be explained) when there are other simpler explanations is, as they say, making things unnecessarily complicated*.{{sidenote|*'''complicated''': see [[Wikipedia:Occam's Razor|Occam's Razor]], a principle attributed to a 14th-century Franciscan friar who apparently agreed that it made proving the existence of God rather iffy [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15636a.htm]}}  
* The evolutionists need to stop worrying that Intelligent Design will, all by itself, turn schoolchildren into Bible-thumping science-haters, and focus on making sure that the scientific method and logical thinking are taught well – so that those children will be immune from B.S. of any persuasion, which is really the greater battle* (regardless of which side of the Creation debate you're on).
+
* The evolutionists need to stop worrying that Intelligent Design will, all by itself, turn schoolchildren into Bible-thumping science-haters, and focus on making sure that the scientific method and logical thinking are taught well
{{quoteon}}*'''greater battle''': "Human [[Wikiquote:History|history]] becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe." -- H. G. Wells{{quoteoff}}
 
That said, the Intelligent Designers need to get much more specific about this theory of theirs, which seems (as far as I can determine, although as of this writing I have not found a concise statement of basic Intelligent Design theory; see Sources) a pretty weak theory. To look at a few obvious points: if a supreme being (often referred to as "God") did create the universe...
 
* Where did He come from?
 
* Did He mess with it any further after creating it, and if so did he ever stop?
 
* If he is still tinkering with it, then why so?
 
* Why couldn't it be that all the fossil and geological evidence we see is truly what happened, and part of His creation?
 
 
 
The evolutionists also need to recognize that just because a casual theory hasn't yet been formulated into something more scientifically rigorous doesn't mean that it's not worth following up. For instance: what evidence could we look for which might indicate the involvement of an extra-universal being (i.e. a being based outside the universe-as-we-understand-it)? More specifically: Would this require a clear violation of the laws of physics as we understand them, or could something be consistent with those laws and yet indicate interference from outside? What would be the difference between interference from outside and interference from beings within the universe but having more knowledge than we do?
 
 
 
The Intelligent Design folks should be asking themselves these questions too. They also need to admit (or understand) that, as far as scientific investigation goes, unless some of these questions get answered, postulating outside interference '''as the whole explanation''' is basically admitting defeat; it's the scientific equivalent of saying "well, it was done by magic", which goes completely against the [[Wikipedia:Philosophy of science|scientific philosophy]]...
 
 
 
...which is, perhaps, back to square one. Is this what the discussion is really about – [[Wikipedia:Empiricism|Empiricism]] versus other ways of discovering reality? If so, what is Intelligent Design truly based on? (Empiricism is often seen as being in opposition to [[Wikipedia:continental rationalism|continental rationalism]]; does the reasoning behind Intelligent Design arise out of something like continental rationalism, or some other school of thought?)
 
==Sources==
 
* [http://www.creationdigest.com/ Creation Digest]: promotes the "intelligent design" theory, although "not affiliated with, nor sponsored or controlled by any religious organization or non-profit association"
 
* Entries from the [http://www.arn.org/ Access Research Network] [http://www.arn.org/id_faq.htm Intelligent Design FAQ]:
 
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20is%20intelligent%20design.htm What is Intelligent Design?]: defines but does not give details
 
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20can%20you%20tell%20if%20something%20is%20designed.htm How Can You Tell if Something is Designed?]: presents an argument based on the presumption that non-randomness implies intelligence (need to write a bit about why this is wrong --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:14, 24 Dec 2005 (CST))
 
** Further entries in the FAQ either start out by asserting the conclusion ("The more we learn about living organisms, the more they look like products of design..." [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20does%20intelligent%20design%20apply%20to%20biology.htm]) and reassert the "order can only come from intelligence" argument ([http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Haven%27t%20scientists%20shown%20that%20biological%20systems%20evolved%20naturalistically.htm])
 
** Counterarguments to the evidence for evolution:
 
*** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Doesn%27t%20the%20fossil%20evidence%20support%20naturalistic%20evolution.htm fossil evidence] at least makes some concrete points worth investigating
 
*** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Can%27t%20we%20actually%20see%20evolution%20in%20action.htm Can't We Actually see Evolution in Action?] gets more into the issue
 
*** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20about%20the%20molecular%20evidence.htm molecular evidence]: I suspect there are some distortions in here, but don't have the facts immediately at hand
 
*** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20about%20the%20evidence%20from%20embryology.htm evidence from embryology] "the study's principal author said of [[Wikipedia:Ernst Haeckel|Haeckel]]'s drawings, 'It looks like it's turning out to be one of the most famous fakes in biology."
 
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Doesn%27t%20Intelligent%20Design%20refer%20to%20something%20supernatural.htm But Doesn't Intelligent Design Refer to Something Supernatural?] at least answers some of the definitional questions about ID; apparently ID doesn't care whether the Intelligent Designer is God or an advanced alien culture
 
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Isn%27t%20%27intelligent%20design%27%20another%20name%20for%20%27scientific%20creationism%27.htm Isn't Intelligent Design Another Name for Scientific Creationism?] distinguishes ID from Creationism and actually gets down to some specifics about ID
 
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20many%20scientists%20take%20this%20stuff%20seriously.htm How Many Scientists Take This Stuff Seriously?] briefly describes scientific interest in ID
 
==Links==
 
* '''2005-12-23''' [http://aetiology.blogspot.com/2005/12/those-who-do-not-learn-from-history.html Those who do not learn from history...]: a bit of history on religion-based science
 
* [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/3906.asp The Skeptics and their "Churchian" Allies]: "Why is evolution so popular today?..."
 

Revision as of 08:54, 10 September 2007

yeah feat usher xenya yugi oh baby chams berte in alto mare zombies cranberries buchholz hotel boschi your latest trick zia forli apocalisse sul fiume giallo y tu que has hecho www tg com it zampogne zelig wav blue spanish eyes testo in ita www trombare www pioggia dorata it bielovar yesterday paul mccartney zadok the priest of tony britten winzip italiano zambrone base musicale la gatta x me importante andate al west bollettino ufficiale della regione umbri wwwferdinandofama com www rofrano it benassi bros feat dhany zahouania www yau it bsb www gry pl bindiya chamkegi www algare com www gewiss it arrivano i carri armati bakstage calendari bubbles barbatul ideal anni verdi www gusanito com mx born to be alive p hernandez www aido it zayon y lenox balla figliola beatriz rico big titts www symantic com blue dubblin www matildebrandi it www max rcs blof counting crows holiday in spain black eyed shut up brasiliani a genova ziberna yin basilicatanet barbe e pizzetti bertolucci brenda carvalo yeu www moby it basi karaoke di salsa bin bau bassa che bassa yamaha r1 begley www iata org barbara durso sex sex topless yhaoomessenger xxx pron anime bic runga bibbia per nokia bigliettini auguri matriomonio bonnie tyler and kareen antonn xxx gay www ornela vorpsi www quattroruote it a caccia di spie www modelle it zero reticoli www joker it x win32 bia 322 y battagliaterme blue spartiti birckenstock heidi klum ballando al buoio www kings of convinience it britney home page assicurasi vergine zeta zero alfa amanti in fuga www sanpaolo banco di napoli wilkommen www roadrunner com www bramkasms pl baby rasta y gringo sentenciado w w w mani tese it www nido hotel com arizona si scatenò... e li fece fuori tutti! yozo kaka ritka bony tailor agenzia matrimoniale "a" www luigi interfree it bony taylor atto d'amore - il magnifico disertore www makelovetome com biografy totti www neuromed benassi midi www coscienza org belle quarantenni xatzigiann brazil you and i y hubo alguien xcrypt x goe give to ya www aol bellezze della tv baila gigi d alessio bagnimojito bennato mediterraneo barbarie 21 settenbre basi remix www triangolo delle bermuda it berlusconi con la bandana bahibak moot xutos bocca di magra bungalow campania 2 persone bayer serie h big cocks ymne a l amour biografia costantino vitigliano willy denzer yaouu borse burberry bus sicilia zir www strano it bacio a mezzanotte bulldozer www istruzione pg blu vacanze basi musicali film best sellers www unpostoalsole org Evolution vs. Intelligent Design: a biased analysis

2007-06-05 Notes: This was written at a time when I hadn't yet extensively researched the situation. My conclusion now is more along the lines of "ID is just a thinly-disguised veneer of scientific-sounding language layered on top of creationism. Evolution may be just a theory, but it is a scientific theory; ID is, at best, an informal theory, and the more you try to get an ID supporter to define their terms or be specific, the more evasions you get. IDers and creationists believe what they believe because it fits what they want to believe, not because it's what the evidence shows."

Related Articles

Point Counterpoint

  • The evolutionists do need to admit that evolution is just a theory, because it is.
  • The Intelligent Design (ID) folks need to admit that while evolution may be just a theory, it fits the facts very well, and while ID may be a theory in the most general sense ("a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action" [1], "An unproven conjecture" wiktionary), it is not a scientific theory ("A coherent statement or set of statements that attempts to explain observed phenomena, which has testable implications, and which is well tested and widely accepted as true." wiktionary), which is (where any doubt exists) generally a requirement for including such ideas in academic curricula.
  • The scientists need to admit that just because something doesn't have a lot of supporting data doesn't mean it isn't (or couldn't be) true, although it may well mean that it is highly unlikely. They also need to admit that we don't yet know enough about the universe to say that it couldn't have been (or wasn't) designed by an intelligent being.
  • The ID folks need to admit that until they have a specific theoretical argument with some testable conclusions, postulating an intelligent entity (which itself would need to be explained) when there are other simpler explanations is, as they say, making things unnecessarily complicated*.
*complicated: see Occam's Razor, a principle attributed to a 14th-century Franciscan friar who apparently agreed that it made proving the existence of God rather iffy [2]
  • The evolutionists need to stop worrying that Intelligent Design will, all by itself, turn schoolchildren into Bible-thumping science-haters, and focus on making sure that the scientific method and logical thinking are taught well