Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Google+/users"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Issue Idealogues: more Jacques)
(Adam Kenigsberg)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
See also [[/protest]] for my protest against the Common Names policy.
 
See also [[/protest]] for my protest against the Common Names policy.
 
==Issue Idealogues==
 
==Issue Idealogues==
 +
* [https://plus.google.com/106403022809621967046 Adam Kenigsberg]:
 +
** [https://plus.google.com/104029794170508855321/posts/cZkXYZpZPVe 2012-07-03] - doesn't like atheists or liberals; repeatedly calls me "miz" and "miss" as if he thinks he's scoring points (how common is this?) (may also be one or two other problematic users in that thread)
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/100637432722229806122 Andrew Andrews]: skilled GW denialist
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/100637432722229806122 Andrew Andrews]: skilled GW denialist
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/109410878385939067590/posts/Qw7pXpadQsx 2012-02-15]
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/109410878385939067590/posts/Qw7pXpadQsx 2012-02-15]

Revision as of 16:41, 4 July 2012

This subpage is for notes on the community in Google+.

See also /protest for my protest against the Common Names policy.

Issue Idealogues

Possible Trolls

Immune to Reason

Keep an Eye On

  • Lance Norris (still active as of 2012-04-26)
    • from this thread: "given a choice between he two, I'll go with the Right. Reagan added millions more jobs than Obama has without spending us into oblivion. The current Republican bills calling for lower taxes and other business incentives have been proven more than once. Obama's stimulus? Thanks to the Democrats we have more debt than at any other time in history and the job growth it was suppose to create still hasn't occurred." When asked for evidence, said he would provide it but was taking an ill relative to the hospital, "stay tuned".
  • Jim Clark - account not found as of 2012-04-26

Regional Sympathizers

Sympathetic types whose general location is known -- might be able to fact-check: