Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Zinnia Jones"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(saving work before going hunting some more)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Background==
 
==Background==
I keep hearing claims that [[Zinnia Jones]] is a fascist or an anti-Semite or some such things. I'm aware that there are a lot of right-wingers and trolls who like to dishonestly paint her in the worst possible light, so I'd always dismissed these claims – until someone credible to me started making similar claims, at which point I felt compelled to investigate.
+
This page is for ongoing analysis of claims that [[Zinnia Jones/bigotry|Zinnia Jones is a fascist or an anti-Semite or some such thing]]. I'm aware that there are a lot of right-wingers and trolls who like to dishonestly paint her in the worst possible light, so I'd always dismissed these claims – until someone credible to me started making similar claims, at which point I felt compelled to investigate (August 2017).
  
 
Just so you know where I'm coming from: I became aware of ZJ via Pharyngula, shortly before she had even realized she was trans (maybe 5 years ago?). I don't follow [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv her on Twitter]; I do follow [https://www.youtube.com/user/ZJemptv her on YouTube], but I had to actually check to be sure because I rarely watch her videos; I mainly use them as reference arguments in case the same subject comes up elsewhere.
 
Just so you know where I'm coming from: I became aware of ZJ via Pharyngula, shortly before she had even realized she was trans (maybe 5 years ago?). I don't follow [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv her on Twitter]; I do follow [https://www.youtube.com/user/ZJemptv her on YouTube], but I had to actually check to be sure because I rarely watch her videos; I mainly use them as reference arguments in case the same subject comes up elsewhere.
  
 
That said, I do know she has been attacked personally over and over again, usually (but not always) by people of a right-wing or at least [[authoritarian]] bent, and I have found her defenses to be well-reasoned and ethically sound.
 
That said, I do know she has been attacked personally over and over again, usually (but not always) by people of a right-wing or at least [[authoritarian]] bent, and I have found her defenses to be well-reasoned and ethically sound.
==Probable Key Events==
 
From the links below (mostly Tweets) plus some things said on Mastodon (to which I don't want to link in case this page attracts negative attention), it sounds like the following things happened:
 
  
# ZJ did a Tweetstorm sometime late in 2016 in which she made some very iffy arguments that could be seen as attacking Jewish people and/or supporting white supremacy
+
For the record, my August 21 take on the situation is [http://issuepedia.org/mw/index.php?title=User:Woozle/Zinnia_Jones&oldid=63287 here]. As of August 25, the existence of the supposed offensive Tweetstorm has become much more dubious, as almost nothing seems to reference it (with the exception of one very vague comment in 2017: "I promise you I'm not exaggerating, she had a weeks-long meltdown about how good drones were").
# ZJ then said nothing else for about half a year
+
==Fisking==
# When called to task for said Tweetstorm in June 2017, she did apologize in reply -- but never posted a public apology or retraction for the 'storm itself
+
===2010===
# Tentatively, the 'storm has been deleted, and trying to confirm this is made difficult by lack of Twitter search tools.
+
* '''12-22 21:33''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/17769849488932864 Holiday stupid: Someone commenting to tell me people are born Jewish and have no choice of whether to be Jewish.] ([http://archive.is/BBGse archive.is])
==Preliminary Conclusions==
 
Unless there is an archived copy of what ZJ actually said, it is impossible for anyone to really judge for themselves the rightness or wrongness of what she said or how she handled it. Even those who saw the original 'storm can't go back and reread it now with a more objective eye (barring those with photographic memories, who might indeed be able to shed some light on this).
 
  
The following, then, is based largely on circumstantial evidence plus trusted-third-party opinions:
+
Yep, that was kind of oblivious. When Jewish people are persecuted, it is generally through ''racial'' accusations rather than their ''beliefs''; persecutors do not give their targets the choice to opt out.
  
# ZJ probably made a big mistake with the original 'storm.
+
That said, I don't think it was intentionally offensive or a dog-whistle. I would have liked to see the follow-up on that – but apparently this wasn't a comment people were truly incensed about; there were no replies, not even in the 2017 thread where it was brought up again.
# ...but she did sincerely apologize for it.
+
===2016===
# She may have made a smaller mistake by not making said apology in a way that was more public and definitive.
+
====September 4====
#* [https://the-orbit.net/zinniajones/2016/11/yes-im-okay-even-better/#more-3049 this post], where she explains her abrupt extended absence from Twitter, might have been a good place in which to at least mention it.
+
* '''05:17''' [https://twitter.com/zjemptv/status/772362909171220480 If she directly ordered me to murder an innocent human being I would still choose her over him. Every time. In every possible universe.]
# I don't, however, get the sense of someone being malicious or uninformed.
+
** I don't know who "she" is, or what she means by "choose", so I have no context with which to evaluate what she's saying. What I do see is people using this as an example of "liberal bullshit" without actually explaining why it's bullshit, which makes me inclined to think ZJ is probably in the right, whatever the dispute may be.
# It also seems likely that she might have (wrongfully) dismissed some legit criticism because, at first glance, it looked like more covert right-wing BS; I'm pretty sure I've done that myself on more than one occasion.
+
** On [https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/comments/586r2e/in_which_a_liberal_believe_drone_strikes_involve/ Reddit], the quote is used in a way that almost certainly misrepresents her argument, whatever it was.
 +
** '''05:17''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/772363034669056000 Because there are things that are bigger than that.]
 +
*** '''10-18 15:29''' (@politiquestions) [https://twitter.com/politiquestions/status/788461982840008704 Like republicans' illegally hoarded ballots. Who will think of the direct material support for the guy you fearmonger about all day] -- "the guy you fearmonger about": who? Donald? Bernie?
 +
*** Tentatively, she might be talking about Hillary vs. Donald -- in which case I'd have to agree with her. Or maybe she's talking about Hillary vs. Bernie, in which case I'd go "umm..." but want to know more context.
 +
====October====
 +
* '''10-08 10:08''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788018914080989185 Donald Trump is best understood as an entity sent by Yahweh of the Bible/Yeshu of Nazareth.] ([http://archive.is/lkucn archive.is])
 +
** '''10-17 10:58''' (@AKA m33n4h) [https://twitter.com/ab_silvera/status/788031327123730432 do you realise how offensive it is to compare a dude who does constant anti-semitic dog whistles to Yahweh?]
 +
*** Another Tweeter tries to explain why the comparison is apt, but AKA m33n4h sarcastically dismisses their argument.
 +
** '''10-18''': presumably what's being discussed here is the September 4 thread.
 +
*** '''20:12''' (reply) [https://twitter.com/thetinkerfae/status/788533294749016065 you aren't Jewish this isn't your place. This is reading as antisemitic]
 +
**** '''20:13''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788533606243328000 I would've chosen a different word given people interpreted it as just about Judaism. It's not, though.]
 +
**** '''20:14''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788533734836412416 It was meant to refer to Christianity's deity, Islam's, LDS Church's, etc.]
 +
**** '''20:15''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788534046921981952 Sorry I phrased it that way. But a faith I don't believe doesn't have to first permit me my "place" before I can criticize it.]
 +
**** '''20:16''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788534162965794817 If anything it's not your place to tell me I'm somehow not allowed to critically analyze the character God in religious texts.]
 +
** '''11:01''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788032128940376064 Also the Old Testament is one long record of God straight-up fucking over the Israelites in every imaginable way] ([http://archive.is/3kkSY archive.is])
 +
** '''11:04''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/788032889325772804 No? Nothing in anything I said was speaking of actual practices of Jewish people. The Bible is fiction.]
 +
* '''10-20''':
 +
** '''13:48''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789161275674599424 "Moral core of the trans community." *shakes head*]
 +
** '''13:50''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789161873648209920 It's almost like these folks have no involvement in the community and have no idea who anyone is besides their twitter faves.]
 +
** '''13:52''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789162342135189509 I mean, if you asked me to name someone I'd name Janet Mox, or Laverne Cox, or the Wachowskis, or Chelsea Manning, or Tobi Hill-mayer...]
 +
** '''13:53''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789162515145957376 ...and I wouldn't even name them because I know there are hundreds of hard working community organizers out there who go unnamed...]
 +
** '''13:53''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789162668410085376 ...who are doing far more for the whole community than any blogger ever will.]
 +
** '''13:55''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789163077233061888 Fuck, I'd name kadybat before Zinnia. Kadybat is helping run a sonic themed charity event for the transgender law center. How trans is that?]
 +
** '''19:04''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789240812785770496 I actually don't want to be some moral center, nobody should be that and I don't think communities should work that way]
 +
** '''20:52''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789268174764138496 then please stop talking and digging yourself into a bigger hole. stop presenting yourself as such a figure.]
 +
** '''21:00''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789270191997878272 I don't want to. I think them seeing me as such a figure amplified the perceived urgency of this, to them.]
 +
** '''21:06''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789271484074262529 when you go on lengthy authoritative sounding rants like this and project an ego it's what happens]
 +
** '''21:11''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789272957663272960 the alternative being? what makes it lengthy or authoritative-sounding that I shouldn't be doing?]
 +
** '''21:14''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789273675228938240 maybe not telling jews their jewish opinions don't matter for a start. sometimes you just need to take a backseat.]
 +
** '''21:15''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789273968175972352 that's authoritative sounding but... what they said isn't? how do you figure?]
 +
*** '''21:19''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789274815991582720 Because she's actually fucking jewish and can tell you what antisemitism looks like. Jesus christ, Zinnia. Cop on.]
 +
**** '''21:20''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789275143382138883 I've been told by more Jewish people that this is not antisemitic than have ever said it is antisemitic]
 +
**** '''21:22''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789275626062639105 Where are these binders full of jews, Zinnia, that have told you this? Every jew I've shown your shit is disgusted.]
 +
**** '''21:23''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789275832514670592 Uh what? Where exactly is your binder?]
 +
**** '''21:25''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789276439501758464 you need to learn to shut the fuck up and actually listen to people that aren't your shitty liberal token friends.]
 +
**** '''21:29''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789277287673888768 You just called Jewish people "shitty liberal token[s]". What would you say that is? Rhymes with 'ranty pacific']
 +
**** '''21:31''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789277835210919937 you're the one who's been taking a dump on actual jews in all this, continually. people who've been tweeting you.]
 +
**** '''21:32''' (@hyenagirl64) [https://twitter.com/hyenagirl64/status/789278131706171392 I don't have anything to add to this discussion. Please un-@ me.]
 +
*** '''21:20''' (@PrincessOtC) [https://twitter.com/PrincessOtC/status/789275007625097217 How would you like a cis person cisplaining to you like this? Getting snarky, saying your trans views don't matter.]
 +
 
 +
What people got upset about, apparently, was ZJ comparing Trump to God using the Old Testament word "Yahweh" to refer to God.
 +
 
 +
A few people took this as anti-Semitic, for reasons that remain unclear; ZJ clarified that she hadn't intended to target the Jewish faith, but rather all monotheism ("Christianity's deity, Islam's, LDS Church's, etc.") and then apologized for her poor choice of phrasing.
 +
 
 +
It should be noted that she also implicated Jesus Christ ("Yeshu of Nazareth") in her comparison, so how is this singling out Jewish people? The accusation seems dishonest, given this.
 +
 
 +
Meanwhile the same people are trying to tell ZJ that criticizing Yahweh "isn't your place" (implicit argument: you may not criticize a religion unless you are a member of that religion – although this is never explained straight out). ZJ rightly declines to be bound by the unspoken rules of a religion she does not follow.
  
So from here, in the absence of any further evidence or arguments, I'd say the real issue has been resolved; I don't see any reason to call out ZJ's actions or discontinue linking/quoting her work.
+
All in all, this reads like fundamentalists taking umbrage at seeing their faith in any way impugned, and using accusations of anti-semitism as a [[soldier argument]] to attempt to shut that criticism down.
  
==Links==
+
The ''only'' legit argument I see buried in all of this (and it's pretty deeply buried, so she can hardly be faulted for missing it) is that someone who has experienced anti-Semitism is likely to be a better judge of what ''comes across'' as anti-Semitic than someone who has never experienced that particular form of bigotry.
Some bits that are supposedly significant with regard to the claims:
+
 
* '''2016-09-04''' [https://twitter.com/zjemptv/status/772362909171220480 "If she directly ordered me to murder an innocent human being I would still choose her over him. Every time. In every possible universe."] I don't know who "she" is, or what she means by "choose", so I have no context with which to evaluate what she's saying. What I do see is people using this as an example of "liberal bullshit" without actually explaining why it's bullshit, which makes me inclined to think ZJ is probably in the right, whatever the dispute may be.
+
What I do ''not'' see is any legit arguments that ZJ is actually anti-Semitic, much less that she was putting out some sort of [[dog whistle]] as a covert invitation for an anti-Semitic pile-on.
** On [https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitLiberalsSay/comments/586r2e/in_which_a_liberal_believe_drone_strikes_involve/ Reddit], the quote is used in a way that almost certainly misrepresents her argument, whatever it was.
+
===2017===
** Here's [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/772363034669056000 a response] where someone implies she's "fearmonger[ing] all day long] about some unnamed guy. Who?
+
====June 9====
*** Tentatively, she might be talking about Hillary vs. Donald -- in which case I'd have to agree with her. Or maybe she's talking about Hillary vs. Bernie, in which case I'd go "umm..." but want to know more context.
+
* '''01:22''' (@AliceAvizandum) [https://twitter.com/AliceAvizandum/status/883919242424455168 'well you picked a bad TIME to criticise our in-house Arab death fetishist' fuck off]
* '''2016-10-20''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/789273968175972352 "that's authoritative sounding but... what they said isn't? how do you figure?"] -- again I can't tell what's being discussed, but the attacks seem very ad-hominem and push all my "BS" buttons. She also (earlier in the thread) says she doesn't want to be considered anyone's moral center, because "communities shouldn't work that way" (i.e. we shouldn't have heroes whose opinions we take onboard uncritically).
+
* '''02:02''' (@MissMacSee) [https://twitter.com/MissMacSee/status/883929272917921792 I'm out of so many loops, is it possible for you to say who this is about?]
* '''2017-06-09''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883954175847084032 "Okay. I wasn't intending to express any kind of antisemitism. I know now that I should have just listened."] This sounds to me like a reasonable apology, though again there's no context so I don't know what the problem was and I can't judge whether this is sufficient.
+
* '''02:02''' (@AliceAvizandum) [https://twitter.com/AliceAvizandum/status/883929442011291649 Zinnia Jones, who's currently the trans piñata for Ray Blanchard and Fox News]
** Note several prior and follow-up tweets where she agrees she made mistakes:
+
** This may be a reference to [[../Ray Blanchard|ZJ's frequent attacks on anti-trans propagandist Ray Blanchard]].
*** "I was wrong. I'm sorry."
+
* '''02:03''' (@AliceAvizandum) [https://twitter.com/AliceAvizandum/status/883929554838052865 I promise you I'm not exaggerating, she had a weeks-long meltdown about how good drones were]
*** "I treated it unseriously and it was way out of line and incredibly disrespectful. I understand that now. I don't support drone strikes."
+
* '''02:09''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883931094739017728 months and months later, i can't un-see any of that]
*** "There was no need for me to get into anything about antisemitism or communism. I could have just stepped away but I didn't."
+
* '''03:16''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883947943992188930 I was wrong. I'm sorry.]
*** "You're right and that's something I neglected. I disregarded the emotional side of things and was very unempathetic. I shouldn't have."
+
* '''03:19''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883948825647493120 could you expand a bit on this {\n\n} it hurt a *lot* of good people, Z]
*** "I get that and I agree. It was needlessly and wantonly destructive. I am trying to make up for it."
+
* '''03:28''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883950903484657665 I treated it unseriously and it was way out of line and incredibly disrespectful. I understand that now. I don't support drone strikes.]
** ...and apparently the subject of the apology was a Tweetstorm some months earlier?
+
* '''03:32''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883951955952926721 There was no need for me to get into anything about antisemitism or communism. I could have just stepped away but I didn't.]
** Someone apparently quotes her as saying "well you picked a bad TIME to criticise our in-house Arab death fetishist" in a way that implies it was a key example of ZJ being offensive; a search for that quote only comes up with the other person quoting her. Possibly ZJ deleted the Tweetstorm in question? Has it been archived anywhere?
+
* '''03:36''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883953028176457728 idk, working thru the anti-Semitism, rather than whether it was expressed or withheld, is probably a more constructive means of remediation]
 +
* '''03:41''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883954175847084032 "Okay. I wasn't intending to express any kind of antisemitism. I know now that I should have just listened.]
 +
* '''03:46''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883955509367361537 i think what came across as more crucial was an insistence on being right as logical premise & not on showing capacity for empathy/humility]
 +
* '''03:50''' [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883956574741569537 You're right and that's something I neglected. I disregarded the emotional side of things and was very unempathetic. I shouldn't have.]
 +
* '''04:04''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883959959502950400 what i'm getting @: folks looked to you as a community organizer for work you've done. that twitterthon was a gesture of community sabotage...]
 +
* '''04:05''' (@patienceinbee) [https://twitter.com/patienceinbee/status/883960227091148800 ...not to yourself, but to all affected by your doubling-down in notably anti-social conduct. contrition will weigh far less than atonement]
 +
* '''04:10''' (ZJ) [https://twitter.com/ZJemptv/status/883961518806749184 I get that and I agree. It was needlessly and wantonly destructive. I am trying to make up for it.]
 +
 
 +
Unless there's a lot more offensive stuff that ZJ said, this apology seems to me more than adequate; I'm not sure I'd have been so patient; it feels to me like she was doing the intellectual heavy-lifting of distilling the valid arguments from the personal attacks that were leveled against her.

Revision as of 16:54, 25 August 2017

Background

This page is for ongoing analysis of claims that Zinnia Jones is a fascist or an anti-Semite or some such thing. I'm aware that there are a lot of right-wingers and trolls who like to dishonestly paint her in the worst possible light, so I'd always dismissed these claims – until someone credible to me started making similar claims, at which point I felt compelled to investigate (August 2017).

Just so you know where I'm coming from: I became aware of ZJ via Pharyngula, shortly before she had even realized she was trans (maybe 5 years ago?). I don't follow her on Twitter; I do follow her on YouTube, but I had to actually check to be sure because I rarely watch her videos; I mainly use them as reference arguments in case the same subject comes up elsewhere.

That said, I do know she has been attacked personally over and over again, usually (but not always) by people of a right-wing or at least authoritarian bent, and I have found her defenses to be well-reasoned and ethically sound.

For the record, my August 21 take on the situation is here. As of August 25, the existence of the supposed offensive Tweetstorm has become much more dubious, as almost nothing seems to reference it (with the exception of one very vague comment in 2017: "I promise you I'm not exaggerating, she had a weeks-long meltdown about how good drones were").

Fisking

2010

Yep, that was kind of oblivious. When Jewish people are persecuted, it is generally through racial accusations rather than their beliefs; persecutors do not give their targets the choice to opt out.

That said, I don't think it was intentionally offensive or a dog-whistle. I would have liked to see the follow-up on that – but apparently this wasn't a comment people were truly incensed about; there were no replies, not even in the 2017 thread where it was brought up again.

2016

September 4

October

What people got upset about, apparently, was ZJ comparing Trump to God using the Old Testament word "Yahweh" to refer to God.

A few people took this as anti-Semitic, for reasons that remain unclear; ZJ clarified that she hadn't intended to target the Jewish faith, but rather all monotheism ("Christianity's deity, Islam's, LDS Church's, etc.") and then apologized for her poor choice of phrasing.

It should be noted that she also implicated Jesus Christ ("Yeshu of Nazareth") in her comparison, so how is this singling out Jewish people? The accusation seems dishonest, given this.

Meanwhile the same people are trying to tell ZJ that criticizing Yahweh "isn't your place" (implicit argument: you may not criticize a religion unless you are a member of that religion – although this is never explained straight out). ZJ rightly declines to be bound by the unspoken rules of a religion she does not follow.

All in all, this reads like fundamentalists taking umbrage at seeing their faith in any way impugned, and using accusations of anti-semitism as a soldier argument to attempt to shut that criticism down.

The only legit argument I see buried in all of this (and it's pretty deeply buried, so she can hardly be faulted for missing it) is that someone who has experienced anti-Semitism is likely to be a better judge of what comes across as anti-Semitic than someone who has never experienced that particular form of bigotry.

What I do not see is any legit arguments that ZJ is actually anti-Semitic, much less that she was putting out some sort of dog whistle as a covert invitation for an anti-Semitic pile-on.

2017

June 9

Unless there's a lot more offensive stuff that ZJ said, this apology seems to me more than adequate; I'm not sure I'd have been so patient; it feels to me like she was doing the intellectual heavy-lifting of distilling the valid arguments from the personal attacks that were leveled against her.