Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eucharist wafer desecration"
(→Thanks!: new section) |
m (→Thanks!: terminology questions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation. | + | {{anonuser|24.121.154.245}} said: I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation. |
== Thanks! == | == Thanks! == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking. | Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking. | ||
| − | I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT) | + | I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality. |
| + | |||
| + | Questions: how is a "wafer" different from a "cracker"? Does usage of the latter indicate bias, and if so how? | ||
| + | --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:49, 3 August 2008
anonymous user 24.121.154.245 said: I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.
Thanks!
Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.
I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality.
Questions: how is a "wafer" different from a "cracker"? Does usage of the latter indicate bias, and if so how? --Woozle 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)