Difference between revisions of "Issuepedia:Spamosophy"
m (moved Talk:Truth to Issuepedia:Spamosophy: starting a collection) |
(all annotated with author and time; recovered some deleted postings from history) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==About== | |
| + | [[Spamosophy]] is Issuepedia's word for apparently randomly-generated bits of text which almost sound coherently philosophical, but which do not actually make sense. | ||
| − | [[User:Woozle|Woozle]] said: That ''almost'' sounded like a logical sentence; you were doing ok until a little way past the first comma. Are you a bot, or a real person? Please explain further if the latter. | + | The following is Issuepedia's collection of spamosophy which has been posted within its pages (mainly in [[Talk:Truth]]). |
| + | ==Postings== | ||
| + | ===(no subject)=== | ||
| + | And you in the long run get to a consensus, where you proceed a nous of what in effect ought to be done, and then they give ground it to me and then I use it. I average draw up it in the brains, the philosophical sense. | ||
| + | |||
| + | —{{anonuser|188.126.69.71}} 2010-04-28 13:20 in [[Talk:Truth]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] said: That ''almost'' sounded like a logical sentence; you were doing ok until a little way past the first comma. Are you a bot, or a real person? Please explain further if the latter. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Life == | ||
| + | |||
| + | But things being what they are I have rush at to allow that the whole excellent is an riddle, a innocuous conundrum that is made terrible on our own mad as a march hare attempt to spell out it as supposing it had an underlying truth. | ||
| + | |||
| + | —{{anonuser|188.126.68.190}}, 2010-06-09 03:23 in [[Talk:Truth]] | ||
| + | == Wisdom == | ||
| + | |||
| + | A humankind begins scathing his discernment teeth the initially chance he bites on holiday more than he can chew. | ||
| + | |||
| + | —{{anonuser|188.126.68.61}}, 2010-06-16 11:05 in [[Talk:Truth]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Special thoughts == | ||
| + | |||
| + | To be a good benign being is to from a amiable of openness to the far-out, an ability to trusteeship aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in very exceptionally circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly important with the prerequisite of the principled autobiography: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a jewel, something somewhat tenuous, but whose mere item beauty is inseparable from that fragility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | —{{anonuser|188.126.68.161}}, 2010-06-22 08:38 in [[Talk:Truth]] | ||
== Special thoughts == | == Special thoughts == | ||
To be a good lenient being is to procure a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an gift to group unsure things beyond your own pilot, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly outstanding with the prerequisite of the ethical passion: that it is based on a trust in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something fairly dainty, but whose acutely precise attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility. | To be a good lenient being is to procure a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an gift to group unsure things beyond your own pilot, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly outstanding with the prerequisite of the ethical passion: that it is based on a trust in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something fairly dainty, but whose acutely precise attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | —{{anonuser|188.126.68.126}}, 2010-06-29 13:06 in [[Talk:Truth]] | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 30 June 2010
About
Spamosophy is Issuepedia's word for apparently randomly-generated bits of text which almost sound coherently philosophical, but which do not actually make sense.
The following is Issuepedia's collection of spamosophy which has been posted within its pages (mainly in Talk:Truth).
Postings
(no subject)
And you in the long run get to a consensus, where you proceed a nous of what in effect ought to be done, and then they give ground it to me and then I use it. I average draw up it in the brains, the philosophical sense.
—anonymous user 188.126.69.71 2010-04-28 13:20 in Talk:Truth
- Woozle said: That almost sounded like a logical sentence; you were doing ok until a little way past the first comma. Are you a bot, or a real person? Please explain further if the latter.
Life
But things being what they are I have rush at to allow that the whole excellent is an riddle, a innocuous conundrum that is made terrible on our own mad as a march hare attempt to spell out it as supposing it had an underlying truth.
—anonymous user 188.126.68.190, 2010-06-09 03:23 in Talk:Truth
Wisdom
A humankind begins scathing his discernment teeth the initially chance he bites on holiday more than he can chew.
—anonymous user 188.126.68.61, 2010-06-16 11:05 in Talk:Truth
Special thoughts
To be a good benign being is to from a amiable of openness to the far-out, an ability to trusteeship aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in very exceptionally circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly important with the prerequisite of the principled autobiography: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a jewel, something somewhat tenuous, but whose mere item beauty is inseparable from that fragility.
—anonymous user 188.126.68.161, 2010-06-22 08:38 in Talk:Truth
Special thoughts
To be a good lenient being is to procure a make of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an gift to group unsure things beyond your own pilot, that can lead you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptionally circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly outstanding with the prerequisite of the ethical passion: that it is based on a trust in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a shop than like a treasure, something fairly dainty, but whose acutely precise attractiveness is inseparable from that fragility.
—anonymous user 188.126.68.126, 2010-06-29 13:06 in Talk:Truth