Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/positions/2013/9-11"

Revision as of 01:38, 12 May 2011

/quiz: my answers to the 9/11 position quiz
/Bayesian: my inexpert attempt at Bayesian analysis of a weakly-believed 9/11 hypothesis

I don't mind people having their own opinions.

I can deal with coming to separate conclusions about the same evidence, though I dislike it.

But when you can't even suggest an hypothesis without being branded a loonie, something is Wrong.

And when otherwise rational people seem to believe they have free license for the use of logical fallacies to attack an idea... something is Wrong.

This is the situation we have now.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * [[/quiz]]: my answers to the [[9-11/disagreement/quiz|9/11 position quiz]]
 * [[/Bayesian]]: my inexpert attempt at Bayesian analysis of a weakly-believed 9/11 hypothesis
+==Meta==
+I don't mind people having their own opinions.
+I can deal with coming to separate conclusions about the same evidence, though I [[Aumann's agreement theorem|dislike it]].
+But when you can't even suggest an hypothesis without being branded a loonie, something is Wrong.
+And when otherwise rational people [[2010-01-29 Rebutting (Again!) the 9/11 Truthers/woozle|seem]] to [[User:Woozle/Facebook/2011-05-04 9-11|believe]] they have free license for the use of logical fallacies to attack an idea... something is Wrong.
+This is the situation we have now.