Difference between revisions of "Throwing spaghetti"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::rhetorical deception category:rhetorical deceptions </hide> ==About== Spaghetti-throwing is a rhetorical technique in whi...") |
(another thing that it's a form of; link to new "goals of rational discourse" page) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Spaghetti-throwing]] is a rhetorical technique in which a large number of counter-arguments are issued in the hope that one or more of them will be seen as valid -- in other words, "throwing spaghetti at the wall until something sticks". It is made possible by reducing the amount of effort which goes into each argument, i.e. not checking for valid logic, previous refutation, or factuality; each argument just has to sound plausible enough not to be rejected ''prima facie'' (i.e. rejected as self-evidently wrong). | [[Spaghetti-throwing]] is a rhetorical technique in which a large number of counter-arguments are issued in the hope that one or more of them will be seen as valid -- in other words, "throwing spaghetti at the wall until something sticks". It is made possible by reducing the amount of effort which goes into each argument, i.e. not checking for valid logic, previous refutation, or factuality; each argument just has to sound plausible enough not to be rejected ''prima facie'' (i.e. rejected as self-evidently wrong). | ||
| − | This technique is consistent with the view of [[arguments as soldiers]], and inconsistent with [[rational]] | + | This technique is consistent with the view of [[arguments as soldiers]], and inconsistent with the [[goals of rational discourse]]. |
| − | + | Spaghetti-throwing is arguably a form of: | |
| + | * [[rhetorical deception]], in that it encourages others to believe that the speaker has a valid case, given the large number of arguments the speaker presents. The fact that none of these arguments are actually valid may easily go unnoticed. | ||
| + | * [[discussion trolling]], in that it derails a discussion with irrelevant arguments (i.e. arguments which consistently turn out to be invalid, and therefore an indication that the speaker is not working honestly towards a common understanding). | ||
Revision as of 14:28, 27 January 2013
About
Spaghetti-throwing is a rhetorical technique in which a large number of counter-arguments are issued in the hope that one or more of them will be seen as valid -- in other words, "throwing spaghetti at the wall until something sticks". It is made possible by reducing the amount of effort which goes into each argument, i.e. not checking for valid logic, previous refutation, or factuality; each argument just has to sound plausible enough not to be rejected prima facie (i.e. rejected as self-evidently wrong).
This technique is consistent with the view of arguments as soldiers, and inconsistent with the goals of rational discourse.
Spaghetti-throwing is arguably a form of:
- rhetorical deception, in that it encourages others to believe that the speaker has a valid case, given the large number of arguments the speaker presents. The fact that none of these arguments are actually valid may easily go unnoticed.
- discussion trolling, in that it derails a discussion with irrelevant arguments (i.e. arguments which consistently turn out to be invalid, and therefore an indication that the speaker is not working honestly towards a common understanding).