Difference between revisions of "DMCA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Related Links: news: 2/16 cellphone link) |
(→Opinionated Summary: Wikipedia seems to have replaced the image of DeCSS with a partial image) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{seed}} | {{seed}} | ||
==Opinionated Summary== | ==Opinionated Summary== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The [[DMCA|Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat [[Copy Protection|copy-protection]] or [[encryption]] are truly ham fisted: | The [[DMCA|Digital Millennium Copyright Act]] is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat [[Copy Protection|copy-protection]] or [[encryption]] are truly ham fisted: | ||
* Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code). | * Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code). | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 20 July 2006
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!
|
Opinionated Summary
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is widely regarded as being one of the most idiotic pieces of technology legislation to come out of the US in recent years. Among other things, the prohibitions it places on any activity which might possibly be interpretable as an attempt to defeat copy-protection or encryption are truly ham fisted:
- Any "technology that can circumvent measures taken to protect copyright" is now illegal under the DMCA; this includes such sophisticated items as magic markers, which can be used to defeat certain CD copy-protection schemes, and t-shirts displaying the DeCSS algorithm (less than one page of C code).
- A Russian programmer was arrested, after giving a talk at a U.S. programming conference, for developing software to allow Adobe eBooks to be read aloud (which was not illegal in Russia)
- Cryptology research is now seriously hampered by the fact that existing encryption methods may no longer legally be reverse-engineered for analysis. [1]
As far as I know, the primary impetus behind the DMCA was media companies trying to prevent anyone from circumventing their encryption-based copy protection.
Reference
Related Links
- HR 1201 would amend the DMCA to be more reasonable
- letter-writing campaign at the EFF
News
- 2006-02-16 DMCA Used to Block Cellphone Secondary Market, among other more obvious uses