Difference between revisions of "Junk science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Reference: consensus science) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Reference== | ==Reference== | ||
* {{wikipedia|Junk science}} | * {{wikipedia|Junk science}} | ||
| + | ==Notes== | ||
| + | * See also [[wikipedia:Consensus science|Consensus science]], "a phrase used to describe a position on an issue that is primarily supported using existing or purported [[scientific consensus]] as an [[appeal to authority]] or [[appeal to the majority]]. It can also refer to a use of scientific consensus in a logical argument as the primary means to demonstrate, establish, or promote a view based on scientific or statistical data which may or may not be part of some hypothesis or theory." Need articles about this and the invoked concepts. | ||
Revision as of 12:32, 28 July 2006
Overview
Junk science is any kind of scientific argument where the conclusions are driven more by a predetermined agenda (often of a political or economic nature) than by any genuine interest in uncovering the truth.
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it – contact me to offer suggestions or additional sources! (Anything tossed in the tip jar also helps
^.^) |
Note that a claim of "junk science" is itself a "junk argument" unless it is backed up by a reasoned, rational argument against the claimed "junk science".
Related Articles
- the Chewbacca defense is often used in junk scientific arguments. Charts, tables of figures, and other complex sources are referenced as key parts of the argument in order to tire the argument's audience and deter further investigation.
Reference
Notes
- See also Consensus science, "a phrase used to describe a position on an issue that is primarily supported using existing or purported scientific consensus as an appeal to authority or appeal to the majority. It can also refer to a use of scientific consensus in a logical argument as the primary means to demonstrate, establish, or promote a view based on scientific or statistical data which may or may not be part of some hypothesis or theory." Need articles about this and the invoked concepts.