Difference between revisions of "2008 financial meltdown"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Black–Scholes model)
(some expansion; link to article about recession)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
<hide>
 +
[[page type::article]]
 +
[[thing type::event]]
 +
[[thing type::crisis]]
 
[[category:events]]
 
[[category:events]]
 +
[[category:economy]]
 +
</hide>
 
==About==
 
==About==
The [[2008 financial meltdown]] has its roots in several actions of the [[US/gov|US government]] whose consequences should have been foreseen by those who made them (and which probably would have caused public outrage for that reason, had current mechanisms of [[online activism]] existed at the time they were enacted). These include:
+
The [[2008 financial meltdown]] either began late in 2007 or in January 2008, depending on which metrics you look at. It led to a long-lasting [[2008 worldwide recession|worldwide recession]] whose effects are still being felt.
* (1999) the [[Glass-Steagall Act/1999 repeal|repeal of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act]], leading to the [[housing bubble]]
+
 
 +
Major contributors include several actions of the [[US/gov|US government]] whose consequences should have been foreseen by those who made them (and which probably would have caused public outrage for that reason, had current mechanisms of [[online activism]] existed at the time they were enacted). These include:
 +
* (1999) the [[Glass-Steagall Act/1999 repeal|repeal of the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act]], leading to the [[housing bubble]] and its inevitable [[2008 mortgage crisis|bursting]]
 
* ([[wikipedia:Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001|2001]], [[wikipedia:Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003|2003]]) the [[Bush tax cuts for the rich]] ({{wikipedia|Bush tax cuts}})
 
* ([[wikipedia:Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001|2001]], [[wikipedia:Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003|2003]]) the [[Bush tax cuts for the rich]] ({{wikipedia|Bush tax cuts}})
* (2001-) two major wars ([[US-Iraq War|Iraq]] and [[US-Afghanistan War|Afghanistan]])
+
* (2001-) two major wars ([[US-Iraq War|Iraq]] and [[US-Afghanistan War|Afghanistan]]), neither of which were paid for by any increase in revenues
 
==Conclusions==
 
==Conclusions==
The proximate cause for the meltdown -- "the straw that broke the camel's back" -- was the bursting of the [[housing bubble]] in 2007, causing extensive damage to the financial industry. Had the investment firms which had become too involved with the new financial instruments permitted by the [[Glass-Steagall Act/1999 repeal|Glass-Steagall repeal]] simply been allowed to fail (with any government money being used to compensate individual investors instead of the failed investment firms), the economy might have recovered -- since no actual essential services were damaged.
+
The proximate cause for the meltdown &ndash; "the straw that broke the camel's back" &ndash; was the [[2008 mortgage crisis|bursting]] of the [[housing bubble]] in late 2007, causing extensive damage to the financial industry. Had the investment firms which had become too involved with the new financial instruments permitted by the [[Glass-Steagall Act/1999 repeal|Glass-Steagall repeal]] simply been allowed to fail (with any government money being used to compensate individual investors instead of the failed investment firms), the economy might have recovered much more quickly &ndash; since the "damage" was entirely a paper construct having to do with allocation of funds; there was no damage to actual essential services or infrastructure.
  
However, first Bush and then Obama approved a series of government bailouts which were given directly to many of the institutions which had behaved irresponsibly -- essentially "socializing" the risk those institutions had taken while allowing them to keep their private profits. (Articles needed: [[socialized risk, privatized profit]], [[corporate welfare]])
+
Unfortunately, first [[George W. Bush|Bush]] and then [[Barack Obama|Obama]] approved a series of government bailouts which were given directly to many of the institutions which had behaved irresponsibly &ndash; essentially "socializing" the risk those institutions had taken while allowing them to keep their private profits. (Articles needed: [[socialized risk, privatized profit]], [[corporate welfare]])
  
 
This in turn deepened the already-severe [[US/gov/budget/deficit|US budget deficit]] and heightened the public perception of a disaster in need of drastic measures.
 
This in turn deepened the already-severe [[US/gov/budget/deficit|US budget deficit]] and heightened the public perception of a disaster in need of drastic measures.
 
+
==Related==
Also related: {{wp/alt|model}}
+
* [[/Clinton]]: [[Bill Clinton]]'s alleged culpability for the meltdown
 +
* [[2008 mortgage crisis]]
 +
* {{wp/alt|Black-Scholes model}}
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
* {{wikipedia|Late-2000s financial crisis}}
+
* {{wikipedia|Financial crisis of 2007–08}}
 
* {{conservapedia|Financial Crisis of 2008}}
 
* {{conservapedia|Financial Crisis of 2008}}
 
* {{!in|dkosopedia}}: no equivalent page as of 2009-05-24
 
* {{!in|dkosopedia}}: no equivalent page as of 2009-05-24

Latest revision as of 23:09, 7 February 2015

About

The 2008 financial meltdown either began late in 2007 or in January 2008, depending on which metrics you look at. It led to a long-lasting worldwide recession whose effects are still being felt.

Major contributors include several actions of the US government whose consequences should have been foreseen by those who made them (and which probably would have caused public outrage for that reason, had current mechanisms of online activism existed at the time they were enacted). These include:

Conclusions

The proximate cause for the meltdown – "the straw that broke the camel's back" – was the bursting of the housing bubble in late 2007, causing extensive damage to the financial industry. Had the investment firms which had become too involved with the new financial instruments permitted by the Glass-Steagall repeal simply been allowed to fail (with any government money being used to compensate individual investors instead of the failed investment firms), the economy might have recovered much more quickly – since the "damage" was entirely a paper construct having to do with allocation of funds; there was no damage to actual essential services or infrastructure.

Unfortunately, first Bush and then Obama approved a series of government bailouts which were given directly to many of the institutions which had behaved irresponsibly – essentially "socializing" the risk those institutions had taken while allowing them to keep their private profits. (Articles needed: socialized risk, privatized profit, corporate welfare)

This in turn deepened the already-severe US budget deficit and heightened the public perception of a disaster in need of drastic measures.

Related

Links

Reference

News

News