Difference between revisions of "Asymmetric skepticism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::phenomenon category:isms </hide> ==About== Asymmetric skepticism is a distortion of the idea of skepticism in which s...") |
m (another category) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[thing type::phenomenon]] | [[thing type::phenomenon]] | ||
[[category:isms]] | [[category:isms]] | ||
| + | [[category:terms of convenience]] | ||
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 22 January 2016
About
Asymmetric skepticism is a distortion of the idea of skepticism in which skeptical thinking is applied primarily to only one side of an argument – that is, a disliked position is viewed "skeptically" while a favored position is not held to the same standards.
This inconsistency allows one to claim the mantle of a "skeptic" or rational thinker while in fact basing one's conclusions entirely on unexamined preferences or prejudices.
Example
People who claim to be "skeptical" about global warming (GW), for example, are engaging in asymmetric skepticism – tending to highlight minor issues and uncertainties in GW arguments while ignoring or dismissing the vast amount of evidence supporting those arguments.