Difference between revisions of "Semantic chameleon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<hide> | <hide> | ||
[[page type::article]] | [[page type::article]] | ||
| − | [[thing type::rhetorical | + | [[thing type::rhetorical deception]] |
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:rhetorical deception]] |
</hide> | </hide> | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | A [[semantic chameleon]] is a word or phrase | + | A [[semantic chameleon]] is a word or phrase with multiple meanings, or no clear meaning at all. This ambiguity can be exploited as a [[rhetorical tool]] in the following ways: |
| + | * to construct a fallacious argument that appears true. | ||
| + | ** In this context, the words aere often used as part of a [[semantic bait-and-switch]] argument, where one definition is used as a "bait" (to get the audience to agree to a key premise) and the other is used as a "hook" (to force the audience to agree with the fallacious conclusion conflating the two definitions). | ||
| + | ** The fallacy can only be discovered by realizing that the same word or phrase is being used to refer to things that are not equivalent. | ||
| + | * to create false controversy, fueled by different people interpreting the words differently. | ||
| + | ** The controversy can only be resolved by narrowing down what was actually meant, if indeed some actual meaning was intended. | ||
| − | + | Such language is especially effective as a rhetorical tool when it appears to reference concepts to which many people may have an [[appeal to emotion|emotional attachment]]. Specific phrases used repeatedly in certain contexts may take on certain associations and become usable as [[dogwhistle]]s. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
* '''Synonyms''': [[chameleon word]], [[chameleon phrase]], [[semantic bait]] | * '''Synonyms''': [[chameleon word]], [[chameleon phrase]], [[semantic bait]] | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
| − | * [[ | + | * [[biological sex]] |
| − | * [[/ | + | * [[capitalism]] is equated with many good things that are not [[defining characteristic]]s |
| + | * [[free market]] | ||
| + | * [[God]] | ||
| + | * [[normal/ambiguity|normal]] | ||
| + | * {{l/sub|sex}} can be either an act or a characteristic | ||
''See also: [[:category:slippery language]]'' | ''See also: [[:category:slippery language]]'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Types== | ||
| + | * An [[ambiguous statement]] is a type of [[semantic chameleon]]. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:34, 3 August 2021
About
A semantic chameleon is a word or phrase with multiple meanings, or no clear meaning at all. This ambiguity can be exploited as a rhetorical tool in the following ways:
- to construct a fallacious argument that appears true.
- In this context, the words aere often used as part of a semantic bait-and-switch argument, where one definition is used as a "bait" (to get the audience to agree to a key premise) and the other is used as a "hook" (to force the audience to agree with the fallacious conclusion conflating the two definitions).
- The fallacy can only be discovered by realizing that the same word or phrase is being used to refer to things that are not equivalent.
- to create false controversy, fueled by different people interpreting the words differently.
- The controversy can only be resolved by narrowing down what was actually meant, if indeed some actual meaning was intended.
Such language is especially effective as a rhetorical tool when it appears to reference concepts to which many people may have an emotional attachment. Specific phrases used repeatedly in certain contexts may take on certain associations and become usable as dogwhistles.
- Synonyms: chameleon word, chameleon phrase, semantic bait
Examples
- biological sex
- capitalism is equated with many good things that are not defining characteristics
- free market
- God
- normal
- sex can be either an act or a characteristic
See also: category:slippery language
Types
- An ambiguous statement is a type of semantic chameleon.