Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dave Dionisi"
(re-asking (and expansion) of 2nd question) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Question Again== | ==Question Again== | ||
If they don't work together, then is their description -- "foreign policy and intelligence professionals who publicly oppose the foreign policies of the Bush II administration" -- the only thing they have in common? I'm trying to figure out if this is really what I'd call a "group", or is it more "a number of people with certain qualifications (careers in foreign policy and intelligence) who also take a particular position (against Bush foreign policy)"? If it's more the latter, then I suspect there are actually quite a few people who could be added to the list. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:45, 30 July 2007 (EDT) | If they don't work together, then is their description -- "foreign policy and intelligence professionals who publicly oppose the foreign policies of the Bush II administration" -- the only thing they have in common? I'm trying to figure out if this is really what I'd call a "group", or is it more "a number of people with certain qualifications (careers in foreign policy and intelligence) who also take a particular position (against Bush foreign policy)"? If it's more the latter, then I suspect there are actually quite a few people who could be added to the list. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 19:45, 30 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | == Response == | ||
| + | Good questions. It could be more exact. I'll work on it. --[[User:Sgl|Sgl]] 15:51, 2 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 2 August 2007
Question
Does the "small group of foreign policy and intelligence professionals..." have a name? Do they formally work together in any sense, or is this more of a descriptive label? --Woozle 18:06, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
Answer
Not to my knowledge -- Sgl 18:40, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
Question Again
If they don't work together, then is their description -- "foreign policy and intelligence professionals who publicly oppose the foreign policies of the Bush II administration" -- the only thing they have in common? I'm trying to figure out if this is really what I'd call a "group", or is it more "a number of people with certain qualifications (careers in foreign policy and intelligence) who also take a particular position (against Bush foreign policy)"? If it's more the latter, then I suspect there are actually quite a few people who could be added to the list. --Woozle 19:45, 30 July 2007 (EDT)
Response
Good questions. It could be more exact. I'll work on it. --Sgl 15:51, 2 August 2007 (EDT)