Difference between revisions of "Debate mapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<hide> page type::article thing type::tool </hide> ==About== Debate mapping is the process of breaking down a debate into its component assertions and [[ar...") |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The result is a [[structured debate]], sometimes called an [[argument map]]. | The result is a [[structured debate]], sometimes called an [[argument map]]. | ||
{{seed}} | {{seed}} | ||
| + | ==Existing Pages== | ||
| + | These need consolidation: | ||
| + | * [[structured debate]] | ||
| + | * [[project:Structured Debate]] | ||
| + | ==Synonyms/Related== | ||
| + | * [[argument map]] ([[argument mapper|-er]], [[argument mapping|-ing]]) | ||
| + | * [[debate map]] ([[debate mapper|-er]], [[debate mapping|-ing]]) | ||
| + | * [[truth map]] ([[truth mapper|-er]], [[truth mapping|-ing]]) | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 8 January 2023
About
Debate mapping is the process of breaking down a debate into its component assertions and arguments and displaying the logical relationships between them.
The result is a structured debate, sometimes called an argument map.
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it – contact me to offer suggestions or additional sources! (Anything tossed in the tip jar also helps
^.^) |
Existing Pages
These need consolidation:
Synonyms/Related
- argument map (-er, -ing)
- debate map (-er, -ing)
- truth map (-er, -ing)