Difference between revisions of "Debate mapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [[structured debate]] | * [[structured debate]] | ||
* [[project:Structured Debate]] | * [[project:Structured Debate]] | ||
| + | * [[instagov:Debate mapper]] | ||
==Synonyms/Related== | ==Synonyms/Related== | ||
* [[argument map]] ([[argument mapper|-er]], [[argument mapping|-ing]]) | * [[argument map]] ([[argument mapper|-er]], [[argument mapping|-ing]]) | ||
* [[debate map]] ([[debate mapper|-er]], [[debate mapping|-ing]]) | * [[debate map]] ([[debate mapper|-er]], [[debate mapping|-ing]]) | ||
* [[truth map]] ([[truth mapper|-er]], [[truth mapping|-ing]]) | * [[truth map]] ([[truth mapper|-er]], [[truth mapping|-ing]]) | ||
Revision as of 21:05, 8 January 2023
About
Debate mapping is the process of breaking down a debate into its component assertions and arguments and displaying the logical relationships between them.
The result is a structured debate, sometimes called an argument map.
|
This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it – contact me to offer suggestions or additional sources! (Anything tossed in the tip jar also helps
^.^) |
Existing Pages
These need consolidation:
Synonyms/Related
- argument map (-er, -ing)
- debate map (-er, -ing)
- truth map (-er, -ing)