Difference between revisions of "Template:Msg.hdr.debate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(CSS tweaks; proper link for argumenticons) |
(catg:debates (do we need to have msg.hdr.debate.struc, so we can distinguish between "traditional" debates and structured ones?)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <center> | + | <includeonly>[[category:debates]]</includeonly><center> |
{| width=80% style="background: #ddddee; font-size: 90%; border: thin solid blue;" | {| width=80% style="background: #ddddee; font-size: 90%; border: thin solid blue;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 13:23, 22 September 2007
|
Contributing As always, Issuepedia is open for contributions (pro and con) from any source on this debate. If you do not feel comfortable trying to use the argumenticon templates, you may simply post your point on the discussion page or in normal text after the point to which you are responding; An Issuepedia editor will be automatically notified of the edit and will apply the proper formatting. Title For technical reasons, titles ending in "?" don't work well on Issuepedia, so we have left it off; the title is supposed to be: |
|
Msg.hdr.debate? |