Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eucharist wafer desecration"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Thanks!: new section)
m (→‎Thanks!: terminology questions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I edited this article because it was clearly biased.  I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer".  I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.
+
{{anonuser|24.121.154.245}} said: I edited this article because it was clearly biased.  I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer".  I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.
  
 
== Thanks! ==
 
== Thanks! ==
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.
 
Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.
  
I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality. --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)
+
I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality.
 +
 
 +
Questions: how is a "wafer" different from a "cracker"? Does usage of the latter indicate bias, and if so how?
 +
--[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:49, 3 August 2008

anonymous user 24.121.154.245 said: I edited this article because it was clearly biased. I took out all instances of "cracker" and replaced them with "wafer". I also better explained the Church's position on the Eucharist and Transubstantiation.

Thanks!

Thanks for your clarifications; the language-mangling with regard to "substance" is particularly interesting. Yes, the article was (and probably still is) biased, but Issuepedia makes no pretension of being unbiased – it's more like a public square full of soapboxes, but with some accountability and fact-checking.

I'm now editing the article further to incorporate your changes while still being clear about how the Church's position conflicts with reality.

Questions: how is a "wafer" different from a "cracker"? Does usage of the latter indicate bias, and if so how? --Woozle 09:05, 3 August 2008 (EDT)