Difference between revisions of "Nuclear power"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→About: whoops. we have had h-bomb detonations, but we don't get useful power out of those...) |
m (→Reference: htyp now has a seed page) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:Issues]] | [[Category:Issues]] | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | + | [[Nuclear power]] is the application of a controlled nuclear chain reaction ('''fission''' or '''fusion''') to generate electrical power. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | [[Nuclear fission]] is the form of nuclear power in common use today. A ''fissile'' nucleus of an atom (typically a heavy atom like uranium) is struck by a neutron, making it unstable enough to split into two pieces. This process consumes a small amount of mass which is converted directly into energy per Einstein's famous equation, E=mc<sup>2</sup>. There are several fissile ''isotopes'' in existence, but the two most commonly used are uranium-235 and plutonium-239. | |
| − | + | [[Nuclear fusion]] is like the opposite of fission: instead of obtaining the energy when heavy atomic nuclei are split, this obtains the energy from when light atomic nuclei are smashed together. Like fission, fusion consumes a small amount of mass to produce a very large amount of energy. Solar energy is fundamentally a result of nuclear fusion reactions in the Sun, and fusion is also the principle behind the thermonuclear weapons, commonly referred to as hydrogen bombs. | |
Of these two forms of nuclear power, fusion is considered desirable over fission because it does not have the risk of meltdowns, does not create proliferation risks, and takes advantage of one of the most abundant substances in the universe: hydrogen. However, no controlled man-made fusion reaction sustained and powerful enough to generate electrical power has been achieved to date despite decades of research. | Of these two forms of nuclear power, fusion is considered desirable over fission because it does not have the risk of meltdowns, does not create proliferation risks, and takes advantage of one of the most abundant substances in the universe: hydrogen. However, no controlled man-made fusion reaction sustained and powerful enough to generate electrical power has been achieved to date despite decades of research. | ||
| − | Conventional nuclear reactors use uranium oxide pellets placed in a heavy reactor vessel that uses water as the primary coolant. Because the coolant water must remain liquid in order to efficiently conduct heat from the core to the turbines, the reactor vessel is pressurized. This means that if the vessel or coolant pipes leak for any reason, the steam that results must be contained because it is radioactive, and a backup system must deliver | + | Conventional nuclear reactors use uranium oxide pellets placed in a heavy reactor vessel that uses water as the primary coolant. Because the coolant water must remain liquid in order to efficiently conduct heat from the core to the turbines, the reactor vessel is pressurized. This means that if the vessel or coolant pipes leak for any reason, the steam that results must be contained because it is radioactive, and a backup system must deliver liquid water to the core lest it overheat and meltdown. |
Because it does not rely on carbon-based fuel except in emergencies, nuclear power does not contribute to greenhouse gases. Also, nuclear power is by far the densest energy source known to man, meaning a single facility can easily provide electricity to a large community. However, there are a number of caveats: | Because it does not rely on carbon-based fuel except in emergencies, nuclear power does not contribute to greenhouse gases. Also, nuclear power is by far the densest energy source known to man, meaning a single facility can easily provide electricity to a large community. However, there are a number of caveats: | ||
*Spent nuclear fuel contains a large amount of fissile material, but cannot be legally reprocessed into new fuel in the United States. This means a large amount of very radioactive material is produced and must be stored securely. | *Spent nuclear fuel contains a large amount of fissile material, but cannot be legally reprocessed into new fuel in the United States. This means a large amount of very radioactive material is produced and must be stored securely. | ||
| − | *Mismanagement of the reactor (Chernobyl) or poor design (Three Mile Island, Fukushima) can result in radioactive substance release or even meltdown. Ideally, reactors should be designed to resist fissile material diversion and to shut down safely without electrical power, human intervention, or radioactive substance release. The history of the nuclear industry suggests that this is seldom the case with current technology. | + | *Mismanagement of the reactor (Chernobyl) or poor design (Three Mile Island, [[2011 Sendai disaster|Fukushima]]) can result in radioactive substance release or even meltdown. Ideally, reactors should be designed to resist fissile material diversion and to shut down safely without electrical power, human intervention, or radioactive substance release. The history of the nuclear industry suggests that this is seldom the case with current technology. |
*Nuclear proliferation, or the use of uranium or plutonium in weapons, is an ongoing concern, particularly in Iran and North Korea. Preventing the widespread acquisition of nuclear weapons or even radioactive dirty bombs is a complex problem that must be addressed at multiple levels. | *Nuclear proliferation, or the use of uranium or plutonium in weapons, is an ongoing concern, particularly in Iran and North Korea. Preventing the widespread acquisition of nuclear weapons or even radioactive dirty bombs is a complex problem that must be addressed at multiple levels. | ||
===Pages=== | ===Pages=== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 29: | ||
* {{dkosopedia}} (Nuclear) | * {{dkosopedia}} (Nuclear) | ||
* {{sourcewatch}} (Nuclear energy) | * {{sourcewatch}} (Nuclear energy) | ||
| + | * {{htyp}} | ||
| + | |||
===Filed Links=== | ===Filed Links=== | ||
| − | {{links | + | {{links/news}} |
===News=== | ===News=== | ||
* '''2006-04-16''' [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/14/AR2006041401209.html Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case] ([http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/17/1939227 slashdot]) by [[Wikipedia:Patrick Moore (environmentalist)|Patrick Moore]], a founder of [[Wikipedia:Greenpeace|Greenpeace]] | * '''2006-04-16''' [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/14/AR2006041401209.html Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case] ([http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/17/1939227 slashdot]) by [[Wikipedia:Patrick Moore (environmentalist)|Patrick Moore]], a founder of [[Wikipedia:Greenpeace|Greenpeace]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:46, 5 May 2014
About
Nuclear power is the application of a controlled nuclear chain reaction (fission or fusion) to generate electrical power.
Nuclear fission is the form of nuclear power in common use today. A fissile nucleus of an atom (typically a heavy atom like uranium) is struck by a neutron, making it unstable enough to split into two pieces. This process consumes a small amount of mass which is converted directly into energy per Einstein's famous equation, E=mc2. There are several fissile isotopes in existence, but the two most commonly used are uranium-235 and plutonium-239.
Nuclear fusion is like the opposite of fission: instead of obtaining the energy when heavy atomic nuclei are split, this obtains the energy from when light atomic nuclei are smashed together. Like fission, fusion consumes a small amount of mass to produce a very large amount of energy. Solar energy is fundamentally a result of nuclear fusion reactions in the Sun, and fusion is also the principle behind the thermonuclear weapons, commonly referred to as hydrogen bombs.
Of these two forms of nuclear power, fusion is considered desirable over fission because it does not have the risk of meltdowns, does not create proliferation risks, and takes advantage of one of the most abundant substances in the universe: hydrogen. However, no controlled man-made fusion reaction sustained and powerful enough to generate electrical power has been achieved to date despite decades of research.
Conventional nuclear reactors use uranium oxide pellets placed in a heavy reactor vessel that uses water as the primary coolant. Because the coolant water must remain liquid in order to efficiently conduct heat from the core to the turbines, the reactor vessel is pressurized. This means that if the vessel or coolant pipes leak for any reason, the steam that results must be contained because it is radioactive, and a backup system must deliver liquid water to the core lest it overheat and meltdown.
Because it does not rely on carbon-based fuel except in emergencies, nuclear power does not contribute to greenhouse gases. Also, nuclear power is by far the densest energy source known to man, meaning a single facility can easily provide electricity to a large community. However, there are a number of caveats:
- Spent nuclear fuel contains a large amount of fissile material, but cannot be legally reprocessed into new fuel in the United States. This means a large amount of very radioactive material is produced and must be stored securely.
- Mismanagement of the reactor (Chernobyl) or poor design (Three Mile Island, Fukushima) can result in radioactive substance release or even meltdown. Ideally, reactors should be designed to resist fissile material diversion and to shut down safely without electrical power, human intervention, or radioactive substance release. The history of the nuclear industry suggests that this is seldom the case with current technology.
- Nuclear proliferation, or the use of uranium or plutonium in weapons, is an ongoing concern, particularly in Iran and North Korea. Preventing the widespread acquisition of nuclear weapons or even radioactive dirty bombs is a complex problem that must be addressed at multiple levels.
Pages
- Thorium nuclear power: a safer, more sustainable alternative
Links
- Ignorance about Nuclear Power is Killing Us
- Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger by Alex Gabbard, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- NuclearInfo.net: Australian site
- The Virtual Nuclear Tourist: nuclear plants around the world
Reference
- Wikipedia
- Conservapedia
(Nuclear Energy) - dKosopedia (Nuclear)
- SourceWatch (Nuclear energy)
- HTYP
Filed Links
Related
- 2013/10/12 [L..T] Despite what you may have heard in the press, Germany's transition to renewable power has been a stunning success. Energy analyst Chris Nelder runs down the facts. "Major English-language media have been propagating a false narrative about the stunning success of Germany's transition to renewable energy: the Energiewende. To hear them tell it, the transition has been a massive failure, driving up power prices, putting Germany's grid at risk of blackouts, and inspiring a mass revolt against renewables. Nothing could be further from the truth."
- 2010/04/16 [L..T] Solar power in Ontario could produce almost as much power as all U.S. nuclear reactors, studies find "Solar power in southeastern Ontario has the potential to produce almost the same amount of power as all the nuclear reactors in the United States, according to two new studies."
News
- 2006-04-16 Going Nuclear: A Green Makes the Case (slashdot) by Patrick Moore, a founder of Greenpeace
- 2006-02-23 Stronger Future for Nuclear Power (slashdot)
Blogging
- 2007-06-08 keyword:nuclear (category of blog entries) by Brian Wang
- 2006-01-15 Long Now Nuclear/Climate Change Debate: includes comments from James Aach