Difference between revisions of "Dissent is disloyalty"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(post-move tidying; filed links section)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Overview==
+
#REDIRECT [[OH BOB SAGET! TOURETTES GUY THINK THIS ARTICLE IS BULLSHIT]]
Claiming that [[dissent is disloyalty]] is basically taking the principle that [[division is weakness]] and extending it logically: if disagreement makes a country weak, then expressing [[dissent]] is equivalent to helping the enemy. Many [[neoconservative]] commentators take this equivalence to the obvious next step and equate dissent with [[treason]], reasoning that dissenters surely ''know'' they are helping the enemy.
 
 
 
Members of the [[Bush II administration]] have often made this equivalence, as have many of its supporters in the media, even though the idea is completely un[[america]]n in nature and counter to the express beliefs of the [[US founding fathers]].
 
 
 
These commentators appear to be completely unaware that they are thereby redefining the US as a [[US totalitarianism|totalitarian state]], as some of them have used the accusation of totalitarianism in other contexts (typically against liberals).
 
==Links==
 
===Filed Links===
 
{{links.tagged}}
 

Revision as of 01:42, 4 September 2008