2006-09-06 DoD News Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary Stimson and Lt. Gen. Kimmons from the Pentagon

<hide> <let name=data index=Date>2006-09-06}}{{#vardefine:Topics|\torture\US military doctrine\John Kimmons\Cully Stimson\Defense Department Directive for Detainee Programs\Army Field Manual for Human Intelligence Collector Operations}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Topics}}{{#vardefine:Topics.disp|\torture\US military doctrine\John Kimmons\Cully Stimson\Defense Department Directive for Detainee Programs\Army Field Manual for Human Intelligence Collector Operations}}{{#vardefine:URL|http://www.defenselink.mil/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3712}}{{#vardefine:keylist%7C{{#var:keylist}}\URL}}{{#vardefine:URL.disp%7Chttp://www.defenselink.mil/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3712}}{{#vardefine:Title%7CDoD News Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary Stimson and Lt. Gen. Kimmons from the Pentagon}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Title}}{{#vardefine:Title.disp|DoD News Briefing with Deputy Assistant Secretary Stimson and Lt. Gen. Kimmons from the Pentagon}}{{#vardefine:Text|“No good intelligence is going to come from abusive practices. I think history tells us that. I think the empirical evidence of the last five years, hard years, tell us that. .. And moreover, any piece of intelligence which is obtained under duress, under -- through the use of abusive techniques would be of questionable credibility. And additionally, it would do more harm than good when it inevitably became known that abusive practices were used. And we can't afford to go there. .. Some of our most significant successes on the battlefield have been -- in fact, I would say all of them, almost categorically all of them have accrued from expert interrogators using mixtures of authorized, humane interrogation practices, in clever ways that you would hope Americans would use them, to push the envelope within the bookends of legal, moral and ethical, now as further refined by this field manual. So we don't need abusive practices in there. Nothing good will come from them.”}}{{#vardefine:keylist|{{#var:keylist}}\Text}}{{#vardefine:Text.disp|“No good intelligence is going to come from abusive practices. I think history tells us that. I think the empirical evidence of the last five years, hard years, tell us that. .. And moreover, any piece of intelligence which is obtained under duress, under -- through the use of abusive techniques would be of questionable credibility. And additionally, it would do more harm than good when it inevitably became known that abusive practices were used. And we can't afford to go there. .. Some of our most significant successes on the battlefield have been -- in fact, I would say all of them, almost categorically all of them have accrued from expert interrogators using mixtures of authorized, humane interrogation practices, in clever ways that you would hope Americans would use them, to push the envelope within the bookends of legal, moral and ethical, now as further refined by this field manual. So we don't need abusive practices in there. Nothing good will come from them.”}} {{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}||}} {{#xploop:{{#var:keylist}}|\n* $s$: \o#var:$s$.disp\c}}

• Topic pages:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}
• Topic categories:{{#xploop:{{#var:Topics}}| $s$}}