Difference between revisions of "Gnomunism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Some wordings of this page are coming from "[http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11012&mode=toc Understanding Knowledge as a Commons]", Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, Nobel 2009. | Some wordings of this page are coming from "[http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=11012&mode=toc Understanding Knowledge as a Commons]", Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, Nobel 2009. | ||
| − | + | == Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, Nobel 2009 == | |
| + | Extracts of [http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262083574intro1.pdf Source] : | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | . Most types of knowledge have, on the other hand, traditionally been relatively nonsubtractive. In fact, the more people who share useful knowledge, the greater the common good. | ||
== Key words == | == Key words == | ||