Difference between revisions of "Bjørn Lomborg"
m (Woozle moved page Björn Lomborg to Bjorn Lomborg) |
m (Woozle moved page Bjorn Lomborg to Björn Lomborg) |
Revision as of 17:31, 25 January 2013
Overview
Björn Lomborg is an Adjunct Professor at the Copenhagen Business School. He has a Master's degree in political science from the University of Aarhus (Denmark; 1991) and a Ph.D. from the Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen (Denmark; 1994). He lectured in statistics in the Department of Political Science at the University of Aarhus, as an assistant professor (1994 – 1996) and associate professor (1997 – 2005). He left the University of Aarhus in February 2005, and in May of that year became an Adjunct Professor at Copenhagen Business School.
Global Warming
Lomborg has become internationally known for his criticisms of global warming theories, largely as expressed in his 1998 Danish book (translated into English in 2001) The Skeptical Environmentalist [W]. After the book's publication, members of the Danish and international scientific community accused Lomborg of scientific dishonesty. These allegations were investigated by appropriate arms of the Danish government and in the end, no official charges were left standing. However, many scientists – in particular climatologists – remain critical of Lomborg's work.
Links
Reference
Quotes About
E.O. Wilson said, in On Bjorn Lomborg and extinction:
My greatest regret about the Lomborg scam is the extraordinary amount of scientific talent that has to be expended to combat it in the media. We will always have contrarians like Lomborg whose sallies are characterized by willful ignorance, selective quotations, disregard for communication with genuine experts, and destructive campaigning to attract the attention of the media rather than scientists. They are the parasite load on scholars who earn success through the slow process of peer review and approval. The question is: How much load should be tolerated before a response is necessary? Lomborg is evidently over the threshold.
The article goes on to refute some of the specific claims made in The Skeptical Environmentalist [W].