Difference between revisions of "Gnomunism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Overview: finance, win) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* [[google:"knowledge commons"]] | * [[google:"knowledge commons"]] | ||
* [[google:"information commons"]] | * [[google:"information commons"]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == How to finance == | ||
| + | How to finance research and creative works if all is put in public domain and accessible for free on internet ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Solutions are to be explored and developped, including : | ||
| + | * volunteering, | ||
| + | * cooperation, coopetition | ||
| + | * patronage, sponsoring | ||
| + | |||
| + | The enterprises are stimulated to research in common, through international and open networks. That is currently the case in some extent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some artists are stimulated to creat in common, through open internet tools and platfoms. The creation is multiplied, the versions of one piece of art are multiplied. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Who wins == | ||
| + | All actors win. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A quasi-monopoly get benefit from creativity and inventions of all start-ups aroud the world ; and start-ups get benefits froms knowledge of quasi-monopoly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Poor countries can produce drug and medicine at local production cost, also food with modern technics, helping to reduce social and political troubles with other countries. | ||
== Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, Nobel 2009 == | == Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom, Nobel 2009 == | ||