Difference between revisions of "Judith Curry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(SkepticalScience) |
m (→Reference: rw has a page (who knew?)) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
===Reference=== | ===Reference=== | ||
* {{wikipedia}} | * {{wikipedia}} | ||
| + | * {{rationalwiki}} | ||
* {{sourcewatch}} | * {{sourcewatch}} | ||
* [http://www.desmogblog.com/judith-curry DeSmogBlog] | * [http://www.desmogblog.com/judith-curry DeSmogBlog] | ||
* [http://www.skepticalscience.com/search.php?Search=judith+curry SkepticalScience] (search) | * [http://www.skepticalscience.com/search.php?Search=judith+curry SkepticalScience] (search) | ||
{{links/smw}} | {{links/smw}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:30, 25 August 2015
About
Judith Curry is the president of Climate Forecast Applications Network and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology (2002-2013).
Links
Reference
News
- 2014/10/10 [L..T] Wall Street Journal Offers a Skewed Climate Perspective from Judith Curry "Like other op-eds, Dr. Curry's is framed as “contradicting” the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and suggests that any reduction in potential risks from climate change can justify delay in reducing emissions."
- 2014/10/06 [L..T] Climate response estimates from Lewis & Curry "While of some scientific interest, the impact for real-world mitigation policy of the range of conceivable values for the TCR is small (see also this discussion in Sci. Am.). For targets like the 2 K guide-rail, a TCR on the lower end of the Lewis and Curry and IPCC ranges might just be the difference between a achievable rate of emissions reduction and an impossible one..."
- 2014/08/27 [L..T] IPCC attribution statements redux: A response to Judith Curry "The bottom line is that multiple studies indicate with very strong confidence that human activity is the dominant component in the warming of the last 50 to 60 years, and that our best estimates are that pretty much all of the rise is anthropogenic."