Difference between revisions of "Nuclear power"

From Issuepedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Links: nuclearinfo.net)
(→‎Links: nucleartourist)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{seed}}[[Category:Issues]]
 
{{seed}}[[Category:Issues]]
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
*[http://russp.org/nucpower.htm Ignorance about Nuclear Power is Killing Us]
+
* [http://russp.org/nucpower.htm Ignorance about Nuclear Power is Killing Us]
*[http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger] by Alex Gabbard, [http://www.ornl.gov/ Oak Ridge National Laboratory]
+
* [http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html Coal Combustion: Nuclear Resource or Danger] by Alex Gabbard, [http://www.ornl.gov/ Oak Ridge National Laboratory]
 
* [http://www.nuclearinfo.net/ NuclearInfo.net]: Australian site
 
* [http://www.nuclearinfo.net/ NuclearInfo.net]: Australian site
 +
* [http://www.nucleartourist.com/ The Virtual Nuclear Tourist]: nuclear plants around the world
  
 
==News==
 
==News==

Revision as of 23:33, 6 October 2006

This page is a seed article. You can help Issuepedia water it: make a request to expand a given page and/or donate to help give us more writing-hours!

Links

News

Fiction

  • Rad Decision (free online read), a technically-accurate techno-thriller "written by an engineer with over twenty years of experience in the American nuclear industry." (Posted August, 2005)
  • The China Syndrome: 1979 movie that represents a large part of most people's knowledge of nuclear power (Chernobyl being much of the remainder)

Notes

Personally, I'd be very interested in seeing a new approach to nuclear power plant management using information-age tools, and the "many eyes make all bugs shallow" approach: webcams on every console, doorway, and access point; publicly-accessible telemetry data; a wiki and blogs maintained by plant workers; chat rooms for workers to let off steam (or mention their worries) during lunch breaks (with convenient computer terminals in the snack rooms); cooperative ownership of the plant, with residents within "fallout" range automatically given priority in voting; and so on. Only in this way can we be sure that safety issues will not be shoved under the carpet, as is apparently being done at Shearon-Harris, our friendly neighborhood nuclear plant here in North Carolina. More nuclear plants without these tools will be business as usual; a nuclear plant with these tools might have a chance to actually be a positive thing. --Woozle 19:24, 5 October 2006 (EDT)