Difference between revisions of "Creation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Links: ARN FAQ) |
(→Links: finished glossing the FAQ) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20is%20intelligent%20design.htm What is Intelligent Design?]: defines but does not give details | ** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20is%20intelligent%20design.htm What is Intelligent Design?]: defines but does not give details | ||
** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20can%20you%20tell%20if%20something%20is%20designed.htm How Can You Tell if Something is Designed?]: presents an argument based on the presumption that non-randomness implies intelligence (need to write a bit about why this is wrong --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:14, 24 Dec 2005 (CST)) | ** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20can%20you%20tell%20if%20something%20is%20designed.htm How Can You Tell if Something is Designed?]: presents an argument based on the presumption that non-randomness implies intelligence (need to write a bit about why this is wrong --[[User:Woozle|Woozle]] 21:14, 24 Dec 2005 (CST)) | ||
| − | ** Further entries in the FAQ either start out by asserting the conclusion ("The more we learn about living organisms, the more they look like products of design..." [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20does%20intelligent%20design%20apply%20to%20biology.htm]) and reassert the "order can only come from intelligence" argument ([http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Haven%27t%20scientists%20shown%20that%20biological%20systems%20evolved%20naturalistically.htm]) | + | ** Further entries in the FAQ either start out by asserting the conclusion ("The more we learn about living organisms, the more they look like products of design..." [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20does%20intelligent%20design%20apply%20to%20biology.htm]) and reassert the "order can only come from intelligence" argument ([http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Haven%27t%20scientists%20shown%20that%20biological%20systems%20evolved%20naturalistically.htm]) |
| + | ** Counterarguments to the evidence for evolution: | ||
| + | *** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Doesn%27t%20the%20fossil%20evidence%20support%20naturalistic%20evolution.htm fossil evidence] at least makes some concrete points worth investigating | ||
| + | *** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Can%27t%20we%20actually%20see%20evolution%20in%20action.htm Can't We Actually see Evolution in Action?] gets more into the issue | ||
| + | *** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20about%20the%20molecular%20evidence.htm molecular evidence]: I suspect there are some distortions in here, but don't have the facts immediately at hand | ||
| + | to be one of the | ||
| + | ** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Doesn%27t%20Intelligent%20Design%20refer%20to%20something%20supernatural.htm But Doesn't Intelligent Design Refer to Something Supernatural?] at least answers some of the definitional questions about ID; apparently ID doesn't care whether the Intelligent Designer is God or an advanced alien culture | ||
| + | ** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/Isn%27t%20%27intelligent%20design%27%20another%20name%20for%20%27scientific%20creationism%27.htm Isn't Intelligent Design Another Name for Scientific Creationism?] distinguishes ID from Creationism and actually gets down to some specifics about ID | ||
| + | ** [http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20many%20scientists%20take%20this%20stuff%20seriously.htm How Many Scientists Take This Stuff Seriously?] briefly describes scientific interest in ID | ||
==Events== | ==Events== | ||