Talk:Circular argument

From Issuepedia
Revision as of 21:29, 26 December 2006 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (changed name of template to avoid problems on talkpages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

midian says

The Circular argument page says:

"Redefining marriage to allow gay people to marry would be a bad idea because what's to stop us from redefining it again to something even worse?" The ending phrase presumes the conclusion that gay marriage is bad, with no supporting argument.

This is a bad example, since it isn't presuming gay marriage is bad, but that redefining terms is bad.

Redefining terms waters down not only our language, but everything based on our language, such as the law.