Thread history
From Issuepedia talk:Page Structure
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21:47, 14 June 2013 | Woozle (talk | contribs) | Deleted | (Duplicate: content was: "This suggestion is in line with my own thinking. It may take awhile before I can get to it, though, as there's some pretty substantial coding involved. If any other..." (and the only contributor was "[[Special:Contributions/Woozle) |
| 21:46, 14 June 2013 | Woozle (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Standard sidebar for individual issues) |
| 21:46, 14 June 2013 | Woozle (talk | contribs) | New reply created (since deleted) | (Reply to Standard sidebar for individual issues) |
| 19:20, 11 June 2013 | Aster (talk | contribs) | Comment text edited | |
| 19:10, 11 June 2013 | Aster (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
Each issue page should have a descriptive sidebar that helps categorize the issue (using one or more categories), provides a map of where the issue fits within its category, and provides a short description of how well-developed the issue page is.
"Well-developed" will require some definition and consensus. Some suggested axes to look at when determining overall quality:
- Number of sources cited
- Quality of sources cited (difficult to measure!)
- Quality of analysis (also difficult to measure)
- Stylistic quality (writing, links to other pages, images, etc)
This suggestion is in line with my own thinking. It may take awhile before I can get to it, though, as there's some pretty substantial coding involved. If any other coders (PHP, mainly) would like to get involved, that could help substantially; I can put together detailed design documents -- collaboratively, if anyone wants to be involved in the design process.